Ganier Franck, Hoareau Charlotte, Tisseau Jacques
a Lab-STICC, UMR 6285 CNRS , Université Européenne de Bretagne, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, European Center for Virtual Reality , Plouzané , France.
Ergonomics. 2014;57(6):828-43. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.899628. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
Virtual reality opens new opportunities for operator training in complex tasks. It lowers costs and has fewer constraints than traditional training. The ultimate goal of virtual training is to transfer knowledge gained in a virtual environment to an actual real-world setting. This study tested whether a maintenance procedure could be learnt equally well by virtual-environment and conventional training. Forty-two adults were divided into three equally sized groups: virtual training (GVT® [generic virtual training]), conventional training (using a real tank suspension and preparation station) and control (no training). Participants then performed the procedure individually in the real environment. Both training types (conventional and virtual) produced similar levels of performance when the procedure was carried out in real conditions. Performance level for the two trained groups was better in terms of success and time taken to complete the task, time spent consulting job instructions and number of times the instructor provided guidance.
虚拟现实为复杂任务的操作员培训带来了新机遇。与传统培训相比,它降低了成本且限制更少。虚拟培训的最终目标是将在虚拟环境中获得的知识应用到实际的现实场景中。本研究测试了通过虚拟环境培训和传统培训学习维护程序的效果是否相同。42名成年人被平均分为三组:虚拟培训组(通用虚拟培训[GVT®])、传统培训组(使用真实的坦克悬挂装置和准备站)和对照组(无培训)。然后,参与者在真实环境中单独执行该程序。当在实际条件下执行该程序时,两种培训方式(传统培训和虚拟培训)产生了相似的表现水平。在任务完成的成功率、完成任务所需时间、查阅工作说明所花费的时间以及指导员提供指导的次数方面,两个接受培训的组的表现水平更好。