New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner, New York, NY, USA; Department of Forensic Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner, New York, NY, USA; Department of Forensic Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Public Health. 2014 Apr;128(4):325-31. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.12.003. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
The current death certification system in the USA fails to accurately track deaths due to adverse medical events. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the under-reporting of deaths due to adverse medical events due to limitations in the current death certification/reporting system, and the benefits of using the term 'therapeutic complication' as the manner of death.
Retrospective review and comparison of death certificates and vital statistical coding.
The manner of death is certified as a therapeutic complication when death is caused by predictable complications of appropriate therapy, and would not have occurred but for the medical intervention. Based on medical examiner records, complications that caused or contributed to deaths over a five-year period were examined retrospectively. These fatalities were compared with deaths coded as medical and surgical complications by the New York City Bureau of Vital Statistics.
The Medical Examiner's Office certified 2471 deaths as therapeutic complications and 312 deaths as accidents occurring in healthcare facilities. In contrast, the New York City Bureau of Vital Statistics reported 188 deaths due to complications of medical and surgical care.
Use of the term 'therapeutic complication' as the manner of death identified nearly 14 times more deaths than were reported by the New York City Bureau of Vital Statistics. If these therapeutic complications and medical accidents were considered as a 'disease', they would rank as the 10th leading cause of death in New York City, surpassing homicides and suicides in some years. Nationwide policy shifts that use the term 'therapeutic complication' would improve the capture and reporting of these deaths, thus allowing better identification of fatal adverse medical events in order to focus on and assess preventative strategies.
美国目前的死亡认证系统未能准确追踪因医疗不良事件导致的死亡。本研究旨在证明由于当前死亡认证/报告系统的限制,因医疗不良事件导致的死亡报告不足,并展示使用“治疗并发症”作为死亡方式的益处。
对死亡证明和生命统计编码进行回顾性审查和比较。
当死亡是由适当治疗的可预测并发症引起的,且如果没有医疗干预本不会发生时,将死因认证为治疗并发症。根据法医记录,回顾性地检查了在五年期间导致或促成死亡的并发症。将这些死亡与纽约市生命统计局编码为医疗和手术并发症的死亡进行比较。
法医办公室将 2471 例死亡认证为治疗并发症,312 例死亡认证为在医疗保健设施中发生的意外。相比之下,纽约市生命统计局报告了 188 例因医疗和手术护理并发症导致的死亡。
使用“治疗并发症”作为死亡方式,确定的死亡人数比纽约市生命统计局报告的人数多出近 14 倍。如果将这些治疗并发症和医疗事故视为一种“疾病”,它们在纽约市的死亡原因排名将位列第十,在某些年份超过了凶杀和自杀。全国范围内的政策转变,使用“治疗并发症”一词,将改善这些死亡的捕获和报告,从而更好地识别致命的医疗不良事件,以便专注于评估和制定预防策略。