Suppr超能文献

扭转潮流:七个欧洲国家增加身体活动的国家政策方法。

Turning the tide: national policy approaches to increasing physical activity in seven European countries.

机构信息

Centre for the Built Environment and Health, School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley.

School of Sport and Exercise Science, Loughborough University, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2015 Jun;49(11):749-56. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093200. Epub 2014 Mar 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physical inactivity is one of the four leading behavioural risk factors for non-communicable disease (NCD). Like tobacco control, increasing levels of health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA) will require a national policy framework providing direction and a clear set of actions. Despite frequent calls, there has been insufficient progress on policy development in the majority of countries around the world. This study sought and summarised national HEPA policy in seven European countries (Finland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia and Switzerland).

METHODS

Data collection used a policy audit tool (PAT), a 27-item instrument structured into four sections.

RESULTS

All countries reported some legislation or policy across the sectors of education, sport and health. Only some countries reported supportive policy in the transport and environment sectors. Five countries reported a stand-alone HEPA policy and six countries reported national recommendations. HEPA prevalence targets varied in magnitude and specificity and the presence of other relevant goals from different sectors highlighted the opportunity for joint action. Evaluation and the use of scientific evidence were endorsed but described as weak in practice. Only two countries reported a national multisector coordinating committee and most countries reported challenges with partnerships on different levels of policy implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Bringing together the key components for success within a national HEPA policy framework is not simple. This in-depth policy audit and country comparison highlighted similarities and differences and revealed new opportunities for consideration by other countries. These examples can inform countries within and beyond Europe and guide the development of national HEPA policy within the NCD prevention agenda.

摘要

背景

身体活动不足是非传染性疾病(NCD)四大主要行为风险因素之一。与控烟类似,要提高促进健康的身体活动(HEPA)水平,就需要有国家政策框架提供指导和明确的行动方案。尽管呼吁不断,但在世界上大多数国家,政策制定工作进展甚微。本研究旨在寻求并总结七个欧洲国家(芬兰、意大利、荷兰、挪威、葡萄牙、斯洛文尼亚和瑞士)的国家 HEPA 政策。

方法

使用政策审核工具(PAT)收集数据,该工具是一个由 27 个项目组成的工具,分为四个部分。

结果

所有国家都在教育、体育和卫生等部门报告了一些立法或政策。只有一些国家在交通和环境部门报告了支持性政策。五个国家报告了单独的 HEPA 政策,六个国家报告了国家建议。HEPA 流行率目标在规模和具体性上存在差异,不同部门的其他相关目标突出了联合行动的机会。评估和利用科学证据得到认可,但在实践中被描述为薄弱。只有两个国家报告了国家多部门协调委员会,大多数国家报告了在不同层面的政策实施方面存在伙伴关系挑战。

结论

将国家 HEPA 政策框架内取得成功的关键要素结合起来并不简单。此次深入的政策审核和国家比较突出了相似之处和差异,并为其他国家提供了新的考虑机会。这些例子可以为欧洲内外的国家提供信息,并为 NCD 预防议程中的国家 HEPA 政策制定提供指导。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验