Aksu Recep, Akin Aynur, Biçer Cihangir, Esmaoğlu Aliye, Tosun Zeynep, Boyaci Adem
Department of Anesthesiology, Erciyes University School of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey.
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2009 Jun;70(3):209-20. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2009.06.003.
Stimulation of various sites, from the nasal mucosa to the diaphragm, can evoke laryngospasm. To reduce airway reflexes, tracheal extubation should be performed while the patient is deeply anesthetized or with drugs that do not depress ventilation. However, tracheal extubation during rhinoplasty may be difficult because of the aspiration of blood and the possibility of laryngospasm. Dexmedetomidine and fentanyl both have sedative and analgesic effects, but dexmedetomidine has been reported to induce sedation without affecting respiratory status.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on airway reflexes and hemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation in patients undergoing rhinoplasty.
This double-blind, randomized, controlled study was conducted at the Erciyes University Medical Center, Kayseri, Turkey. Patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II who were undergoing elective rhinoplasty between January 2007 and June 2007 with general anesthesia were eligible for study entry. Using a sealed-envelope method, the patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (20 patients per group). Five minutes before extubation, patients received either dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg in 100 mL of isotonic saline or fentanyl 1 μg/kg in 100 mL of isotonic saline intravenously. All patients were extubated by anesthesiologists who were blinded to the study drugs, and all were continuously monitored for 15 minutes after extubation. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and oxygen saturation using pulse oximetry (SpO2) were recorded before anesthesia, after drug administration, after skin incision, at the completion of surgery, and 1, 5, and 10 minutes before and after tracheal extubation. Any prevalence of laryngospasm, bronchospasm, or desaturation was recorded.
Forty patients (25 men, 15 women; mean [SD] age, 24.86 [7.43] years) were included in the study. Dexmedetomidine was associated with a significant increase in extubation quality compared with fentanyl, reflected in the prevalence of cough after extubation (85% [17/20] vs 30% [6/20] of patients, respectively; P = 0.001). There were no clinically significant decreases in HR, SBP, DBP, or SpO2 after extubation with dexmedetomidine or fentanyl. In the dexmedetomidine group, HR was not significantly increased after extubation; however, in the fentanyl group, HR was significantly increased compared with the preextubation values (all, P = 0.007). HR was significantly higher in the fentanyl group compared with the dexmedetomidine group at 1, 5, and 10 minutes after extubation (all, P = 0.003). Compared with preextubation values, SBP was significantly increased at 1 and 5 minutes after extubation in the dexmedetomidine group (both, P = 0.033) and at 1, 5, and 10 minutes after extubation in the fentanyl group (all, P = 0.033). The postoperative sedation scores and the extubation, awakening, and orientation times were not significantly different between the 2 groups. In the dexmedetomidine group, bradycardia (HR <45 beats/min) was observed in 2 patients and emesis was observed in 2 patients. In the fentanyl group, emesis was observed in 3 patients, bradycardia in 2 patients, vomiting in 1 patient, and shivering in 1 patient; vertigo was reported in 1 patient. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of adverse events between the 2 groups.
The findings in the present study suggest that dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg IV, administered before extubation, was more effective in attenuating airway reflex responses to tracheal extubation and maintaining hemodynamic stability without prolonging recovery compared with fentanyl 1 μg/kg IV in these patients undergoing rhinoplasty.
从鼻粘膜到横膈膜等不同部位受到刺激时,都可能引发喉痉挛。为减少气道反射,应在患者深度麻醉时或使用不抑制通气的药物时进行气管拔管。然而,由于鼻整形术中存在血液误吸和喉痉挛的可能性,气管拔管可能会很困难。右美托咪定和芬太尼都具有镇静和镇痛作用,但据报道右美托咪定可诱导镇静而不影响呼吸状态。
本研究旨在比较右美托咪定和芬太尼对鼻整形术患者气管拔管时气道反射及血流动力学反应的影响。
本双盲、随机、对照研究在土耳其开塞利的埃尔西耶斯大学医学中心进行。2007年1月至2007年6月期间接受全身麻醉下择期鼻整形术、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级为I或II级的患者符合研究入组条件。采用密封信封法,将患者随机分为2组(每组20例)。拔管前5分钟,患者静脉注射100 mL等渗盐水中含0.5 μg/kg右美托咪定或100 mL等渗盐水中含1 μg/kg芬太尼。所有患者均由对研究药物不知情的麻醉医师进行拔管,拔管后持续监测15分钟。记录麻醉前、给药后、皮肤切开后、手术结束时以及气管拔管前后1、5和10分钟时的心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)以及使用脉搏血氧饱和度仪测得的血氧饱和度(SpO2)。记录任何喉痉挛、支气管痉挛或血氧饱和度降低的发生率。
40例患者(25例男性,15例女性;平均[标准差]年龄,24.86 [7.43]岁)纳入研究。与芬太尼相比,右美托咪定使拔管质量显著提高,这体现在拔管后咳嗽发生率上(分别为85% [17/20]对30% [6/20]的患者;P = 0.001)。使用右美托咪定或芬太尼拔管后,HR、SBP、DBP或SpO2均无临床上显著的降低。在右美托咪定组,拔管后HR未显著增加;然而,在芬太尼组,HR与拔管前值相比显著增加(均P = 0.007)。拔管后1、5和10分钟时,芬太尼组的HR显著高于右美托咪定组(均P = 0.003)。与拔管前值相比,右美托咪定组拔管后1和5分钟时SBP显著升高(均P = 0.033),芬太尼组拔管后1、5和10分钟时SBP均显著升高(均P = 0.0