Kang Jin Gu, Lee Chul Joong, Kim Tae Hyeong, Sim Woo Seok, Shin Byung Seop, Lee Sang Hyun, Nahm Francis Sahngun, Lee Pyung Bok, Kim Yong Chul, Lee Sang Chul
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Seoul Hospital, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2010 Apr;71(2):93-104. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2010.04.001.
The overexcitation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor complex appears to play a critical role in the development of neuropathic pain, and ketamine acts as an antagonist to that receptor. Some publications have reported on the prominent relief of neuropathic pain with intravenous or subcutaneous ketamine infusions or a single-dose intravenous ketamine injection despite adverse effects.
The primary objective of this study was to determine the analgesic effect of intravenous ketamine infusion therapy for neuropathic pain refractory to conventional treatments. Secondary objectives included identifying the variables related to the analgesic effect and the pain descriptors susceptible to ketamine infusion.
This 2-week, open-label, uncontrolled study was conducted in Korean patients with neuropathic pain recruited from the Samsung Seoul Hospital (Seoul, Republic of Korea) outpatient pain management unit. Patients were required to have a pain severity score >5 (visual analog scale [VAS], where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable) over a period of ≥1 month while on standard treatment. The patients were required to have shown no benefit from standard treatment and no pain relief lasting over 1 month. The ketamine infusion therapy was composed of 3 sessions performed consecutively every other day. Midazolam was administered concomitantly to reduce the occurrence of central nervous system-related adverse events (AEs) secondary to ketamine. Each session was as follows: ketamine 0.2 mg/kg and midazolam 0.1 mg/kg were administered intravenously for 5 minutes as a loading dose, followed by a continuous infusion of ketamine 0.5 mg/kg/h and midazolam 0.025 mg/kg/h for 2 hours. AEs were assessed in the following ways: close monitoring of ECG, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and evaluating the need for treatment of AEs during infu- sion and until discharge by an attending anesthesiologist; an open question about discomfort at the end of each session; spontaneous reports about AEs during each session; and the patients' and caregivers' checklist of AEs occurring at home for 2 weeks after discharge. All the descriptors of pain expressed by the patients in Korean were recorded and translated into appropriate English terminology on the basis of the literature on Korean verbal descriptors of pain. Each of the translated pain descriptors was then classified into 1 of 18 sensory items.
The overall VAS score for pain decreased from a baseline mean (SD) of 7.20 (1.77) to 5.46 (2.29) (P < 0.001) 2 weeks after treatment in 103 patients (53 males and 50 females; mean age, 52.56 [17.33] years) who completed the study. Variables such as age, sex, and the duration and diagnosis of pain were not found to be associated with analgesic effect. Seven of the 18 pain descriptors were found to have a significant response to ketamine infusion treatment between baseline and 2 weeks follow-up: burning pain (P = 0.008); dull, aching pain (P < 0.001); overly sensitive to touch (P = 0.002); stabbing pain (P = 0.008); electric pain (P = 0.031); tingling pain (P < 0.001); and squeezing pain (P < 0.001). A total of 52 patients reported AEs: 33 during infusion and 44 during recovery and up to 2 weeks follow up. The most commonly reported AEs were snoring (15 [15%]) during infusion and dizziness (43 [42%]) during recovery.
Ketamine infusion therapy was associated with reduced severity of neuropathic pain and generally well tolerated for up to 2 weeks in these patients with neuropathic pain refractory to standard treatment. Variables such as sex, age, and the diagnosis and duration of pain had no association with the analgesic effect of this treatment. Randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of treatment with ketamine infusion.
N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体复合物的过度兴奋似乎在神经性疼痛的发展中起关键作用,而氯胺酮是该受体的拮抗剂。一些出版物报道,尽管有不良反应,但静脉或皮下注射氯胺酮或单次静脉注射氯胺酮可显著缓解神经性疼痛。
本研究的主要目的是确定静脉输注氯胺酮疗法对常规治疗无效的神经性疼痛的镇痛效果。次要目的包括确定与镇痛效果相关的变量以及对氯胺酮输注敏感的疼痛描述词。
这项为期2周的开放标签、非对照研究在从三星首尔医院(韩国首尔)门诊疼痛管理单元招募的韩国神经性疼痛患者中进行。患者在接受标准治疗期间,需要在≥1个月的时间内疼痛严重程度评分>5(视觉模拟量表[VAS],0=无疼痛,10=可想象的最严重疼痛)。患者需显示未从标准治疗中获益且疼痛缓解持续时间不超过1个月。氯胺酮输注疗法由每隔一天连续进行的3次治疗组成。同时给予咪达唑仑以减少氯胺酮引起的中枢神经系统相关不良事件(AE)的发生。每次治疗如下:静脉注射氯胺酮0.2mg/kg和咪达唑仑0.1mg/kg,持续5分钟作为负荷剂量,随后以氯胺酮0.5mg/kg/h和咪达唑仑0.025mg/kg/h持续输注2小时。通过以下方式评估AE:由主治麻醉师密切监测心电图、血压、血氧饱和度,并评估输注期间直至出院时治疗AE的必要性;每次治疗结束时关于不适的开放性问题;每次治疗期间关于AE的自发报告;以及患者和护理人员关于出院后2周在家中发生的AE的清单。患者用韩语表达的所有疼痛描述词均被记录,并根据韩国疼痛语言描述词的文献将其翻译成适当的英语术语。然后将每个翻译后的疼痛描述词分类到18个感觉项目中的1个。
在完成研究的103例患者(53例男性和50例女性;平均年龄52.56[17.33]岁)中,治疗2周后疼痛的总体VAS评分从基线平均值(标准差)7.20(1.77)降至5.46(2.29)(P<0.001)。未发现年龄、性别、疼痛持续时间和诊断等变量与镇痛效果相关。在18个疼痛描述词中,有7个在基线至随访2周期间对氯胺酮输注治疗有显著反应:灼痛(P=0.008);钝痛、酸痛(P<0.001);对触摸过度敏感(P=0.002);刺痛(P=0.008);电击样疼痛(P=0.031);刺痛感(P<0.001);压榨性疼痛(P<0.001)。共有52例患者报告了AE:输注期间33例,恢复期间及随访至2周期间44例。最常报告的AE是输注期间打鼾(15[15%])和恢复期间头晕(43[42%])。
氯胺酮输注疗法与神经性疼痛严重程度降低相关,在这些对标准治疗无效的神经性疼痛患者中,一般在长达两周的时间内耐受性良好。性别、年龄以及疼痛的诊断和持续时间等变量与该治疗的镇痛效果无关。需要进行随机对照试验来评估氯胺酮输注治疗的疗效和耐受性。