Department of Psychological Sciences, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Br J Clin Psychol. 2014 Sep;53(3):315-32. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12048. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
The aims of the study were to (1) revise the Impact of Event Scale-Revised for use with people with intellectual disabilities (IDs), creating the Impact of Event Scale-Intellectual Disabilities (IES-IDs), (2) assess the reliability of the IES-IDs, and (3) compare the IES-IDs to an existing measure trauma-related symptomatology, namely the Lancaster and Northgate Trauma Scale (LANTS), along with measures of anxiety and depression.
Forty adults with IDs who had experienced at least one traumatic event were recruited and completed the IES-IDs and the LANTS on two occasions, separated by 2 weeks. Participants also completed the Glasgow Depression Scale and the Glasgow Anxiety Scale, along with the Trauma Information Form which was used to collect information about trauma history.
Fifteen per cent of the sample had encountered five or more traumatic events. The IES-IDs and the LANTS had good to excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Both measures correlated with self-report measures of depression and anxiety, although the strength of this correlation was greater with the LANTS. There was a significant positive correlation between trauma frequency and the IES-IDs, while trauma frequency did not correlate with the LANTS.
Both the IES-IDs and the LANTS appear to have good reliability.
There is a lack of well-developed questionnaires that can be used to assess symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in people with intellectual disabilities. The Impact of Event Scale-Revised was augmented creating the Impact of Event Scale-Intellectual Disabilities (IES-IDs). The IES-IDs was shown to have good psychometric properties. The IES-IDs was compared to the Lancaster and Northgate Trauma Scale (LANTS), but the LANTS did not correlate with trauma frequency. However, this study had a small sample size, and a much larger study is needed to examine the factor structure of both the IES-IDs and the LANTS. Future studies should attempt to recruit people with IDs who have a diagnosis of PTSD.
本研究的目的是:(1)修订用于智力障碍者(ID)的事件影响量表修订版(IES-R),创建智力障碍者事件影响量表(IES-IDs),(2)评估 IES-IDs 的可靠性,(3)将 IES-IDs 与现有的创伤相关症状测量工具,即兰开斯特和诺思盖特创伤量表(LANTS),以及焦虑和抑郁的测量工具进行比较。
招募了 40 名经历过至少一次创伤事件的 ID 成年人,他们在两周内两次完成了 IES-IDs 和 LANTS。参与者还完成了格拉斯哥抑郁量表和格拉斯哥焦虑量表,以及创伤信息表,该表用于收集创伤史信息。
样本中有 15%的人经历过五次或更多的创伤事件。IES-IDs 和 LANTS 具有良好到极好的内部一致性和重测信度。两种测量方法都与自我报告的抑郁和焦虑测量方法相关,尽管与 LANTS 的相关性更强。创伤频率与 IES-IDs 呈显著正相关,而创伤频率与 LANTS 不相关。
IES-IDs 和 LANTS 似乎都具有良好的可靠性。
目前缺乏可用于评估智力障碍者创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的成熟问卷。修订后的事件影响量表(IES-R)被扩充,创建了智力障碍者事件影响量表(IES-IDs)。IES-IDs 具有良好的心理测量特性。IES-IDs 与兰开斯特和诺思盖特创伤量表(LANTS)进行了比较,但 LANTS 与创伤频率不相关。然而,这项研究的样本量较小,需要进行更大规模的研究来检验 IES-IDs 和 LANTS 的因子结构。未来的研究应该尝试招募患有 PTSD 的 ID 患者。