• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会网络关系超越非冗余性:知识内容和关系强度对创造力影响的实验研究。

Social network ties beyond nonredundancy: an experimental investigation of the effect of knowledge content and tie strength on creativity.

机构信息

Emory University.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2014 Sep;99(5):831-46. doi: 10.1037/a0036385. Epub 2014 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1037/a0036385
PMID:24684668
Abstract

Social network research emphasizes the access to nonredundant knowledge content that network ties provide. I suggest that some content is more beneficial than others and that tie strength may affect creativity for reasons other than the associated structure. That is, tie strength may affect how individuals process nonredundant knowledge. I investigate 2 types of knowledge content--information (i.e., facts or data) and frames (i.e., interpretations or impressions)--and explore whether tie strength influences their effect on creativity. Drawing on creativity theory, I employ an experimental design to provide greater theoretical clarity and to isolate causality. According to the results from 2 studies, distinct frames received from contacts facilitate creativity, but the effect of distinct information is more complex. When individuals receive distinct information from strong ties, it constrains creativity compared to distinct frames. Content from weak ties appears to facilitate creativity across all scenarios. The results of mediated moderation analysis indicate the effect of framing versus information for strong ties is driven by decision-making time, as an indicator of cognitive expansion.

摘要

社交网络研究强调了获取网络关系提供的非冗余知识内容的重要性。我认为,某些内容比其他内容更有益,并且关系强度可能会影响创造力,而不仅仅是因为与之相关的结构。也就是说,关系强度可能会影响个人处理非冗余知识的方式。我研究了两种类型的知识内容——信息(即事实或数据)和框架(即解释或印象)——并探讨了关系强度是否会影响它们对创造力的影响。根据创造力理论,我采用实验设计来提供更清晰的理论认识和隔离因果关系。根据两项研究的结果,来自联系人的不同框架有助于创造力,但不同信息的效果则更为复杂。当个人从强关系中获得不同的信息时,与不同的框架相比,它会限制创造力。来自弱关系的内容似乎在所有情况下都有助于创造力。中介调节分析的结果表明,对于强关系而言,信息和框架的效果是由决策时间决定的,这是认知扩展的一个指标。

相似文献

1
Social network ties beyond nonredundancy: an experimental investigation of the effect of knowledge content and tie strength on creativity.社会网络关系超越非冗余性:知识内容和关系强度对创造力影响的实验研究。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Sep;99(5):831-46. doi: 10.1037/a0036385. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
2
Heard it through the grapevine: indirect networks and employee creativity.小道消息:间接网络与员工创造力。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Mar;100(2):567-74. doi: 10.1037/a0038333. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
3
Creative benefits from well-connected leaders: leader social network ties as facilitators of employee radical creativity.创意得益于人脉广泛的领导者:领导者的社会网络关系作为促进员工激进创造力的因素。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Sep;99(5):966-75. doi: 10.1037/a0037088. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
4
The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: a comprehensive examination and extension.弱关系视角下的创造力:全面的检验与拓展。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 May;95(3):592-601. doi: 10.1037/a0018761.
5
Social networks, personal values, and creativity: evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects.社交网络、个人价值观与创造力:对曲线和交互作用的验证。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Nov;94(6):1544-52. doi: 10.1037/a0016285.
6
Strength matters: Tie strength as a causal driver of networks' information benefits.强度很重要:连接强度作为网络信息效益的因果驱动因素。
Soc Sci Res. 2017 Jul;65:268-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
7
Multidimensional tie strength and economic development.多维联系强度与经济发展。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 21;12(1):22081. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26245-4.
8
Disseminating educational innovations in health care practice: training versus social networks.在医疗实践中传播教育创新:培训与社交网络。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 May;70(10):1509-17. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.035. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
9
Quantifying the impact of strong ties in international scientific research collaboration.量化强关系在国际科学研究合作中的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 17;18(1):e0280521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280521. eCollection 2023.
10
Tie and tag: A study of tie strength and tags for photo sharing.绑定和标记:照片分享中的联系强度和标签研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 29;13(8):e0202540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202540. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived Costs versus Actual Benefits of Demographic Self-Disclosure in Online Support Groups.在线支持小组中人口统计学自我披露的感知成本与实际收益
J Consum Psychol. 2021 Jul;31(3):450-477. doi: 10.1002/jcpy.1200. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
2
Reflecting glory or deflecting stigma? The interplay between status and social proximity in peer evaluations.反映荣耀还是转移污名?地位和社会亲近在同伴评价中的相互作用。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 25;15(9):e0238651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238651. eCollection 2020.