Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Jun;93(6):590-5. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12387. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
To evaluate the performance of external electronic fetal heart rate and uterine contraction monitoring according to maternal body mass index.
Secondary analysis of prospective equivalence study.
Three US urban teaching hospitals.
Seventy-four parturients with a normal term pregnancy.
The parent study assessed performance of two methods of external fetal heart rate monitoring (abdominal fetal electrocardiogram and Doppler ultrasound) and of uterine contraction monitoring (electrohystero-graphy and tocodynamometry) compared with internal monitoring with fetal scalp electrode and intrauterine pressure transducer. Reliability of external techniques was assessed by the success rate and positive percent agreement with internal methods. Bland-Altman analysis determined accuracy. We analyzed data from that study according to maternal body mass index.
We assessed the relationship between body mass index and monitor performance with linear regression, using body mass index as the independent variable and measures of reliability and accuracy as dependent variables.
There was no significant association between maternal body mass index and any measure of reliability or accuracy for abdominal fetal electrocardiogram. By contrast, the overall positive percent agreement for Doppler ultrasound declined (p = 0.042), and the root mean square error from the Bland-Altman analysis increased in the first stage (p = 0.029) with increasing body mass index. Uterine contraction recordings from electrohysterography and tocodynamometry showed no significant deterioration related to maternal body mass index.
Accuracy and reliability of fetal heart rate monitoring using abdominal fetal electrocardiogram was unaffected by maternal obesity, whereas performance of ultrasound degraded directly with maternal size. Both electrohysterography and tocodynamometry were unperturbed by obesity.
评估根据母体体重指数评估外部胎儿心率和子宫收缩监测的性能。
前瞻性等效性研究的二次分析。
三家美国城市教学医院。
74 名正常足月妊娠的产妇。
母研究评估了两种外部胎儿心率监测方法(腹部胎儿心电图和多普勒超声)和子宫收缩监测方法(电子宫图和宫缩描记法)与内部监测(胎儿头皮电极和宫内压力传感器)的性能。通过与内部方法的成功率和阳性百分比一致性来评估外部技术的可靠性。Bland-Altman 分析确定了准确性。我们根据母体体重指数分析了该研究的数据。
我们使用线性回归分析体重指数与监测性能之间的关系,将体重指数作为自变量,可靠性和准确性作为因变量。
母体体重指数与腹部胎儿心电图的任何可靠性或准确性测量均无显著关联。相比之下,随着体重指数的增加,多普勒超声的总体阳性百分比一致性下降(p=0.042),Bland-Altman 分析的均方根误差在第一阶段增加(p=0.029)。电子宫图和宫缩描记法的子宫收缩记录与母体体重指数无显著恶化相关。
使用腹部胎儿心电图的胎儿心率监测的准确性和可靠性不受母体肥胖的影响,而超声的性能则直接随母体大小而降低。电子宫图和宫缩描记法均不受肥胖影响。