Dew Kevin, Norris Pauline, Gabe Jonathan, Chamberlain Kerry, Hodgetts Darrin
School of Social and Cultural Studies, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand.
School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, New Zealand.
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Apr;131:272-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Mar 16.
This article extends our understanding of the everyday practices of pharmaceuticalisation through an examination of moral concerns over medication practices in the household. Moral concerns of responsibility and discipline in relation to pharmaceutical consumption have been identified, such as passive or active medication practices, and adherence to orthodox or unorthodox accounts. This paper further delineates dimensions of the moral evaluations of pharmaceuticals. In 2010 and 2011 data were collected from 55 households across New Zealand and data collection techniques, such as photo- and diary-elicitation interviews, allowed the participants to develop and articulate reflective stories of the moral meaning of pharmaceuticals. Four repertoires were identified: a disordering society repertoire where pharmaceuticals evoke a society in an unnatural state; a disordering self repertoire where pharmaceuticals signify a moral failing of the individual; a disordering substances repertoire where pharmaceuticals signify a threat to one's physical or mental equilibrium; a re-ordering substances repertoire where pharmaceuticals signify the restoration of function. The research demonstrated that the dichotomies of orthodox/unorthodox and compliance/resistance do not adequately capture how medications are used and understood in everyday practice. Attitudes change according to why pharmaceuticals are taken and who is taking them, their impacts on social relationships, and different views on the social or natural production of disease, the power of the pharmaceutical industry, and the role of health experts. Pharmaceuticals are tied to our identity, what we want to show of ourselves, and what sort of world we see ourselves living in. The ordering and disordering understandings of pharmaceuticals intersect with forms of pharmaceuticalised governance, where conduct is governed through pharmaceutical routines, and where self-responsibility entails following the prescription of other agents. Pharmaceuticals symbolise forms of governance with different sets of roles and responsibilities.
本文通过审视家庭用药实践中的道德问题,拓展了我们对药物化日常实践的理解。已识别出与药物消费相关的责任和纪律方面的道德问题,例如被动或主动用药实践,以及对正统或非正统观念的遵循。本文进一步阐述了对药物进行道德评估的维度。2010年和2011年,从新西兰各地的55个家庭收集了数据,诸如照片和日记启发式访谈等数据收集技术,使参与者能够展开并阐述关于药物道德意义的反思性故事。识别出了四种表述方式:一种是无序社会表述方式,即药物唤起一个处于非自然状态的社会;一种是无序自我表述方式,即药物意味着个人的道德失败;一种是无序物质表述方式,即药物意味着对一个人身体或精神平衡的威胁;一种是重新排序物质表述方式,即药物意味着功能的恢复。研究表明,正统/非正统以及顺从/抗拒的二分法并不能充分捕捉药物在日常实践中的使用和理解方式。态度会根据用药原因、用药者身份、药物对社会关系的影响,以及对疾病的社会或自然成因、制药行业的权力和健康专家的角色的不同观点而改变。药物与我们的身份、我们想展现的自我以及我们所认为自己生活的世界紧密相连。对药物的有序和无序理解与药物化治理形式相互交织,在这种治理形式中,行为通过药物常规来管理,自我责任意味着遵循其他行为主体的处方。药物象征着具有不同角色和责任设定的治理形式。