Suppr超能文献

通过网络监测定位错误:一种用于心脏手术中同行评估、风险识别及患者安全工作优先级确定的多方法途径

Locating Errors Through Networked Surveillance: A Multimethod Approach to Peer Assessment, Hazard Identification, and Prioritization of Patient Safety Efforts in Cardiac Surgery.

作者信息

Thompson David A, Marsteller Jill A, Pronovost Peter J, Gurses Ayse, Lubomski Lisa H, Goeschel Christine A, Gosbee John W, Wahr Joyce, Martinez Elizabeth A

机构信息

From the *Johns Hopkins Medicine, Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality; †Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, ‡School of Nursing, and §Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, ∥University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor; and ¶Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2015 Sep;11(3):143-51. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000059.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to develop a scientifically sound and feasible peer-to-peer assessment model that allows health-care organizations to evaluate patient safety in cardiovascular operating rooms and to establish safety priorities for improvement.

METHODS

The locating errors through networked surveillance study was conducted to identify hazards in cardiac surgical care. A multidisciplinary team, composed of organizational sociology, organizational psychology, applied social psychology, clinical medicine, human factors engineering, and health services researchers, conducted the study. We used a transdisciplinary approach, which integrated the theories, concepts, and methods from each discipline, to develop comprehensive research methods. Multiple data collection was involved: focused literature review of cardiac surgery-related adverse events, retrospective analysis of cardiovascular events from a national database in the United Kingdom, and prospective peer assessment at 5 sites, involving survey assessments, structured interviews, direct observations, and contextual inquiries. A nominal group methodology, where one single group acts to problem solve and make decisions was used to review the data and develop a list of the top priority hazards.

RESULTS

The top 6 priority hazard themes were as follows: safety culture, teamwork and communication, infection prevention, transitions of care, failure to adhere to practices or policies, and operating room layout and equipment.

CONCLUSIONS

We integrated the theories and methods of a diverse group of researchers to identify a broad range of hazards and good clinical practices within the cardiovascular surgical operating room. Our findings were the basis for a plan to prioritize improvements in cardiac surgical care. These study methods allowed for the comprehensive assessment of a high-risk clinical setting that may translate to other clinical settings.

摘要

目标

目标是开发一种科学合理且可行的同行评估模型,使医疗保健机构能够评估心血管手术室的患者安全,并确定改进的安全重点。

方法

通过网络监测研究定位错误,以识别心脏外科护理中的危害。一个由组织社会学、组织心理学、应用社会心理学、临床医学、人因工程学和卫生服务研究人员组成的多学科团队开展了这项研究。我们采用了跨学科方法,整合各学科的理论、概念和方法,以开发全面的研究方法。涉及多种数据收集:对心脏手术相关不良事件进行重点文献综述、对英国一个国家数据库中的心血管事件进行回顾性分析,以及在5个地点进行前瞻性同行评估,包括调查评估、结构化访谈、直接观察和情境调查。采用名义小组法,即由一个单一小组负责解决问题和做出决策,来审查数据并制定最优先危害清单。

结果

前6个优先危害主题如下:安全文化、团队合作与沟通、感染预防、护理转接、未遵守操作规范或政策以及手术室布局和设备。

结论

我们整合了不同研究人员的理论和方法,以识别心血管外科手术室中的广泛危害和良好临床实践。我们的研究结果是心脏外科护理改进优先计划的基础。这些研究方法允许对高风险临床环境进行全面评估,这可能适用于其他临床环境。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验