• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善心脏外科学术护理:一种工作系统方法。

Improving cardiac surgical care: a work systems approach.

机构信息

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 1513 University Ave, 3214 Mechanical Engineering Bldg, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2010 Sep;41(5):701-12. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.008. Epub 2010 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.008
PMID:20202623
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2879339/
Abstract

Over the past 50 years, significant improvements in cardiac surgical care have been achieved. Nevertheless, surgical errors that significantly impact patient safety continue to occur. In order to further improve surgical outcomes, patient safety programs must focus on rectifying work system factors in the operating room (OR) that negatively impact the delivery of reliable surgical care. The goal of this paper is to provide an integrative review of specific work system factors in the OR that may directly impact surgical care processes, as well as the subsequent recommendations that have been put forth to improve surgical outcomes and patient safety. The important role that surgeons can play in facilitating work system changes in the OR is also discussed. The paper concludes with a discussion of the challenges involved in assessing the impact that interventions have on improving surgical care. Opportunities for future research are also highlighted throughout the paper.

摘要

在过去的 50 年中,心脏外科学术护理取得了重大进展。然而,仍会发生严重影响患者安全的手术失误。为了进一步改善手术结果,患者安全计划必须专注于纠正手术室(OR)中对可靠手术护理产生负面影响的工作系统因素。本文的目的是综合回顾 OR 中可能直接影响手术护理流程的特定工作系统因素,以及为改善手术结果和患者安全而提出的后续建议。还讨论了外科医生在促进 OR 中的工作系统变革方面可以发挥的重要作用。本文最后讨论了评估干预措施对改善手术护理的影响所涉及的挑战。本文还在各处强调了未来研究的机会。

相似文献

1
Improving cardiac surgical care: a work systems approach.改善心脏外科学术护理:一种工作系统方法。
Appl Ergon. 2010 Sep;41(5):701-12. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.008. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
2
A note on "Improving cardiac surgical care: a work systems approach".关于《改善心脏外科护理:一种工作系统方法》的注释
Appl Ergon. 2011 Nov;42(6):941. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.02.001. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
3
Locating Errors Through Networked Surveillance: A Multimethod Approach to Peer Assessment, Hazard Identification, and Prioritization of Patient Safety Efforts in Cardiac Surgery.通过网络监测定位错误:一种用于心脏手术中同行评估、风险识别及患者安全工作优先级确定的多方法途径
J Patient Saf. 2015 Sep;11(3):143-51. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000059.
4
Safety and complexity: inter-departmental relationships as a threat to patient safety in the operating department.安全性与复杂性:手术室中部门间关系对患者安全构成威胁
J Health Organ Manag. 2006;20(2-3):227-42. doi: 10.1108/14777260610662753.
5
Understanding safety and performance in the cardiac operating room: from 'sharp end' to 'blunt end'.了解心脏手术室的安全性和性能:从“前端”到“后端”
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Oct;21(10):807-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001135.
6
A commitment to safety. Tools for implementing JCAHO's new patient safety standards.对安全的承诺。实施联合委员会国际部(JCAHO)新的患者安全标准的工具。
Trustee. 2001 Jun;54(6):15-21.
7
The use of checklists as a method to reduce human error in cardiac operating rooms.使用检查表作为减少心脏手术室人为失误的一种方法。
Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2013 Winter;51(1):179-94. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0b013e31827da461.
8
Auditing and improving the sponge count process.审核并改进手术器械清点流程。
OR Manager. 2003 Mar;19(3):13-4.
9
Depicting adverse events in cardiac theatre: the preliminary conception of the RECORD model.描绘心脏手术中的不良事件:RECORD模型的初步构想。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Mar 19;8:51. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-8-51.
10
A commitment to safety.对安全的承诺。
Hosp Health Netw. 2001 Jun;75(6):47-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analytic Synthesis (PROSPERO CRD420251049574).阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停与心脏手术结局:一项Meta分析的系统评价(国际前瞻性系统评价注册库编号CRD420251049574)
Biomedicines. 2025 Jun 27;13(7):1579. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13071579.
2
Endoscopic Robotic Mitral Operating Room as a Microsystem for Safety and Sustainability.作为用于安全与可持续性的微系统的内镜机器人二尖瓣手术室
Innovations (Phila). 2024 Sep-Oct;19(5):485-493. doi: 10.1177/15569845241278605. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
3
Human factors in anaesthetic practice. Part 2: clinical implications.

本文引用的文献

1
Preoperative Safety Briefing Project.术前安全简报项目
Perm J. 2004 Spring;8(2):21-7. doi: 10.7812/TPP/04.968.
2
Identifying methods to improve heart surgery: an operative approach and strategy for implementation on an organizational level.确定改善心脏手术的方法:一种在组织层面实施的手术方法和策略。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Nov;34(5):1027-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.07.007. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
3
WHO's patient-safety checklist for surgery.世界卫生组织手术患者安全核对清单。
麻醉实践中的人为因素。第2部分:临床意义。
BJA Educ. 2024 Feb;24(2):68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2023.11.003. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
4
Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence based bleeding management in Australian Cardiac Surgery Units: a qualitative interview study analysed with the theoretical domains framework and COM-B model.实施基于证据的出血管理在澳大利亚心脏外科单位的障碍和促进因素:应用理论领域框架和 COM-B 模型进行的定性访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 5;21(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06269-8.
5
Exploring SEIPS 2.0 as a model for analyzing care transitions across work systems.探讨 SEIPS 2.0 模型在分析工作系统间的护理交接中的应用。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Oct;88:103141. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103141. Epub 2020 May 16.
6
Flow disruptions in robotic-assisted abdominal sacrocolpopexy: does robotic surgery introduce unforeseen challenges for gynecologic surgeons?机器人辅助腹骶骨固定术中的血流中断:机器人手术是否给妇科外科医生带来了意想不到的挑战?
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Dec;30(12):2177-2182. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03929-6. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
7
Implementing Medical Technological Equipment in the OR: Factors for Successful Implementations.在手术室中实施医疗技术设备:成功实施的因素。
J Healthc Eng. 2018 Aug 29;2018:8502187. doi: 10.1155/2018/8502187. eCollection 2018.
8
Using a systems approach to evaluate a circulating nurse's work patterns and workflow disruptions.运用系统方法评估巡回护士的工作模式和工作流程中断情况。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Jul;78:293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.03.017. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
9
Safety of Workers in Indian Mines: Study, Analysis, and Prediction.印度矿山工人的安全:研究、分析与预测
Saf Health Work. 2017 Sep;8(3):267-275. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
10
Human factors in mental healthcare: A work system analysis of a community-based program for older adults with depression and dementia.精神卫生保健中的人为因素:一项针对患有抑郁症和痴呆症的老年人的社区项目的工作系统分析。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Oct;64:27-40. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 13.
Lancet. 2008 Jul 5;372(9632):1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60964-2.
4
Relationship between preventability of death after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and all-cause risk-adjusted mortality rates.冠状动脉搭桥手术后死亡的可预防性与全因风险调整死亡率之间的关系。
Circulation. 2008 Jun 10;117(23):2969-76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.722249.
5
Evaluation of a preoperative checklist and team briefing among surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists to reduce failures in communication.评估外科医生、护士和麻醉师术前检查表及团队简报以减少沟通失误。
Arch Surg. 2008 Jan;143(1):12-7; discussion 18. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.21.
6
Development of medical checklists for improved quality of patient care.为提高患者护理质量而制定医疗检查表。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Feb;20(1):22-30. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm062. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
7
Organizational factors associated with high performance in quality and safety in academic medical centers.学术医疗中心中与质量和安全方面的高绩效相关的组织因素。
Acad Med. 2007 Dec;82(12):1178-86. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318159e1ff.
8
Disruptions in surgical flow and their relationship to surgical errors: an exploratory investigation.手术流程中断及其与手术失误的关系:一项探索性调查。
Surgery. 2007 Nov;142(5):658-65. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.07.034.
9
Assessing the quality of surgical care.评估外科护理质量。
Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Aug;87(4):837-52, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.06.002.
10
Best practices in OR suite layout and equipment choices to reduce slips, trips, and falls.手术室布局和设备选择的最佳实践,以减少滑倒、绊倒和跌倒。
AORN J. 2007 Sep;86(3):384-94; quiz 395-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2007.06.003.