Kates R E, Yee Y G, Hill I
Cardiology Division, Falk Cardiovascular Research Center, Stanford University Medical Center, California 94305.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1989 Jan;13(1):168-72.
The electrophysiologic stability of isolated perfused rabbit hearts was evaluated over a period of 5 h. Hearts perfused with protein-free buffer deteriorated over time, with significant shortening of the ventricular effective refractory period (ERP) and development of ventricular fibrillation. When serum albumin (6.01 x 10(-4) mM) was added to the perfusate, hearts were more stable, the ventricular ERPs remained relatively constant throughout the 5-h perfusion period, and hearts did not fibrillate. When a fatty acid-free protein source was used, the hearts demonstrated similar stability to those perfused with protein containing fatty acids. Despite marked changes in the refractory periods of hearts perfused with protein-free buffer, the QRS interval did not change over time, indicating that this is a very insensitive parameter for monitoring the electrophysiologic stability of isolated perfused hearts. In studies utilizing isolated hearts to evaluate antiarrhythmic drug effects, it is preferable to use a protein-containing buffer.
在5小时的时间段内评估了离体灌注兔心脏的电生理稳定性。用无蛋白缓冲液灌注的心脏随时间推移而恶化,心室有效不应期(ERP)显著缩短并出现心室颤动。当向灌注液中加入血清白蛋白(6.01×10⁻⁴ mM)时,心脏更稳定,在整个5小时的灌注期内心室ERP保持相对恒定,且心脏未发生颤动。当使用无脂肪酸的蛋白质来源时,心脏表现出与用含脂肪酸蛋白质灌注的心脏相似的稳定性。尽管用无蛋白缓冲液灌注的心脏不应期有明显变化,但QRS间期并未随时间改变,这表明这是监测离体灌注心脏电生理稳定性的一个非常不敏感的参数。在利用离体心脏评估抗心律失常药物作用的研究中,最好使用含蛋白质的缓冲液。