• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种模型在肺栓塞预后中的联合与比较:来自土耳其肺栓塞研究组(TUPEG)的研究结果

Combination and comparison of two models in prognosis of pulmonary embolism: results from TUrkey Pulmonary Embolism Group (TUPEG) study.

作者信息

Ozsu Savas, Ozlu Tevfik, Sentürk Ayşegül, Uçar Elif Yılmazel, Kırkıl Gamze, Kadıoğlu Esra Ekbiç, Altınsoy Bülent, Saylan Bengü, Selimoğlu Hatice Şen, Dabak Gül, Tutar Nuri, Uysal Ahmet

机构信息

Karadeniz Technical University, School of Medicine, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Trabzon, Turkey.

Ankara Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Ankara,Turkey.

出版信息

Thromb Res. 2014 Jun;133(6):1006-10. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.02.032. Epub 2014 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2014.02.032
PMID:24690480
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical parameters, biomarkers and imaging-based risk stratification are widely accepted in pulmonary embolism(PE). The present study has investigated the prognostic role of simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) score and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) model.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included a total of 1078 patients from a multi-center registry, with objectively confirmed acute symptomatic PE. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality during the first 30days, and the secondary endpoint included all-cause mortality, nonfatal symptomatic recurrent PE, or nonfatal major bleeding.

RESULTS

Of the 1078 study patients, 95 (8.8%) died within 30days of diagnosis. There was no significant difference between non-low-risk patients ESC [12.2% (103 of 754;)] and high-risk patients as per the sPESI [11.6% (103 of 796)] for 30-day mortality. The nonfatal secondary endpoint occurred in 2.8% of patients in the the sPESI low-risk and 1.9% in the ESC low-risk group. Thirty-day mortality occurred in 2.2% of patients the sPESI low-risk and in 2.2% the ESC low-risk group (P=NS). In the present study, in the combination of the sPESI low-risk and ESC model low-risk mortality rate was 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

The sPESI and the ESC model showed a similar performance regarding 30-day mortality and secondary outcomes in the present study. However, the combination of these two models appears to be particularly valuable in PE.

摘要

背景

临床参数、生物标志物和基于影像学的风险分层在肺栓塞(PE)中已被广泛接受。本研究调查了简化肺栓塞严重程度指数(sPESI)评分和欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)模型的预后作用。

方法

这项前瞻性队列研究共纳入了来自多中心登记处的1078例患者,这些患者均经客观证实为急性症状性PE。主要终点是前30天内的全因死亡率,次要终点包括全因死亡率、非致命性症状性复发性PE或非致命性大出血。

结果

在1078例研究患者中,95例(8.8%)在诊断后30天内死亡。ESC非低风险患者[12.2%(754例中的103例)]和根据sPESI的高风险患者[11.6%(796例中的103例)]的30天死亡率无显著差异。sPESI低风险组2.8%的患者和ESC低风险组1.9%的患者发生了非致命性次要终点。sPESI低风险组2.2%的患者和ESC低风险组2.2%的患者发生了30天死亡率(P=无统计学意义)。在本研究中,sPESI低风险和ESC模型低风险的组合死亡率为0%。

结论

在本研究中,sPESI和ESC模型在30天死亡率和次要结局方面表现相似。然而,这两种模型的组合在PE中似乎特别有价值。

相似文献

1
Combination and comparison of two models in prognosis of pulmonary embolism: results from TUrkey Pulmonary Embolism Group (TUPEG) study.两种模型在肺栓塞预后中的联合与比较:来自土耳其肺栓塞研究组(TUPEG)的研究结果
Thromb Res. 2014 Jun;133(6):1006-10. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.02.032. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
2
A strategy combining imaging and laboratory biomarkers in comparison with a simplified clinical score for risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism.一种结合影像学和实验室生物标志物的策略与简化的临床评分比较,用于急性肺栓塞患者的风险分层。
Chest. 2012 Apr;141(4):916-922. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-1355. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
3
Validation of two clinical prognostic models in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism.验证两种临床预后模型在急性有症状肺栓塞患者中的应用。
Arch Bronconeumol. 2013 Oct;49(10):427-31. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 May 9.
4
The shock index and the simplified PESI for identification of low-risk patients with acute pulmonary embolism.休克指数和简化的 PESI 对急性肺栓塞低危患者的识别。
Eur Respir J. 2011 Apr;37(4):762-6. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00070110. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
5
Risk stratifying emergency department patients with acute pulmonary embolism: Does the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index perform as well as the original?对急性肺栓塞急诊科患者进行风险分层:简化版肺栓塞严重程度指数的表现与原版一样好吗?
Thromb Res. 2016 Dec;148:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.09.023. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
6
Predictive value of the high-sensitivity troponin T assay and the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index in hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective validation study.高敏肌钙蛋白 T 检测和简化的肺栓塞严重指数对血流动力学稳定的急性肺栓塞患者的预测价值:一项前瞻性验证研究。
Circulation. 2011 Dec 13;124(24):2716-24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.051177. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
7
Identification of Low-Risk Patients with Acute Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism for Outpatient Therapy.识别急性有症状性肺栓塞的低危患者以进行门诊治疗。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Aug;12(8):1122-9. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201504-202OC.
8
Acute pulmonary embolism: mortality prediction by the 2014 European Society of Cardiology risk stratification model.急性肺栓塞:2014 年欧洲心脏病学会风险分层模型预测死亡率。
Eur Respir J. 2016 Sep;48(3):780-6. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00024-2016. Epub 2016 May 12.
9
Validation of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Risk Classification and the 2019 European Society of Cardiology Risk Stratification in the Southeast Asian Population with Acute Pulmonary Embolism.急性肺栓塞东南亚人群中肺栓塞严重指数风险分类和 2019 年欧洲心脏病学会风险分层的验证。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023 Nov 1;30(11):1601-1611. doi: 10.5551/jat.64094. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
10
Usefulness of Simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Score for Identification of Patients With Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism and Active Cancer: From the COMMAND VTE Registry.简化肺栓塞严重指数评分对低危肺栓塞合并活动性癌症患者的识别作用:来自 COMMAND VTE 注册研究。
Chest. 2020 Mar;157(3):636-644. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.08.2206. Epub 2019 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The value of sPESI for risk stratification in patients with pulmonary embolism.sPESI 对肺栓塞患者风险分层的价值。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2019 Jul;48(1):149-157. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01814-z.
2
Benefit of early discharge among patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism.低风险肺栓塞患者早期出院的益处。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 10;12(10):e0185022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185022. eCollection 2017.
3
Prognostic models in acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性肺栓塞的预后模型:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 29;6(4):e010324. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010324.
4
Evaluation of cardiac biomarkers and right ventricular dysfunction in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.急性肺栓塞患者心脏生物标志物及右心室功能障碍的评估
Anatol J Cardiol. 2016 Apr;16(4):276-82. doi: 10.5152/akd.2014.5828. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
5
Value of Cardiac Troponin and sPESI in Treatment of Pulmonary Thromboembolism at Outpatient Setting.心肌肌钙蛋白和简化肺栓塞严重程度指数在门诊治疗肺血栓栓塞症中的价值
Lung. 2015 Aug;193(4):559-65. doi: 10.1007/s00408-015-9727-5. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
6
Prognostic role of simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index and the European Society of Cardiology Prognostic Model in short- and long-term risk stratification in pulmonary embolism.简化肺栓塞严重程度指数和欧洲心脏病学会预后模型在肺栓塞短期和长期风险分层中的预后作用
Pak J Med Sci. 2014 Nov-Dec;30(6):1259-64. doi: 10.12669/pjms.306.5737.