Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiangmai University.
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023 Nov 1;30(11):1601-1611. doi: 10.5551/jat.64094. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
To date, no studies representing the Southeast Asian population have validated the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) and 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) risk stratification. Therefore, this study aimed to validate the PESI score, simplified PESI (sPESI), PESI risk classification, and 2019 ESC risk stratification in Southeast Asian patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE).
The present study is a 10-year cross-sectional study. Here, risk regressions were conducted to identify the PESI risk classification, sPESI, and 2019 ESC risk stratification as predictors for 30-day all-cause and PE-related mortalities. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the diagnostic ability of the PESI score, sPESI score, PESI risk classification, and 2019 ESC risk stratification to predict 30-day mortality.
A total of 696 patients (male, 286; female, 410; mean age, 57.7±15.7 years) were included in this study from 2011 to 2020. The risk of 30-day all-cause mortality progressively increased with the 2019 ESC risk stratification, being approximately 6-fold higher in the high-risk than in the low-risk class [risk ratio: 6.24 (95% confidence interval (CI), 3.12, 12.47), P<0.001]. The risk of 30-day all-cause mortality with the PESI risk classification also increased with the risk classes, being approximately 6-fold higher in class V than in class I [adjusted risk ratio: 5.91 (95% CI, 2.25, 15.51), P<0.001]. The highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) of the predictive model was the PESI score [AuROC=0.733 (95% CI, 0.685, 0.782)].
Our study represents a good validation of the PESI and 2019 ESC risk stratification to predict 30-day mortality after APE diagnosis in the Southeast Asian population.
迄今为止,尚无研究代表东南亚人群验证过肺栓塞严重指数(PESI)和 2019 年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)风险分层。因此,本研究旨在验证 PESI 评分、简化 PESI(sPESI)、PESI 风险分类和 2019 年 ESC 风险分层在东南亚急性肺栓塞(APE)患者中的作用。
本研究为 10 年的横断面研究。在此,进行风险回归以确定 PESI 风险分类、sPESI 和 2019 年 ESC 风险分层作为预测 30 天全因和与 PE 相关死亡率的指标。构建受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线以确定 PESI 评分、sPESI 评分、PESI 风险分类和 2019 年 ESC 风险分层预测 30 天死亡率的诊断能力。
本研究纳入了 2011 年至 2020 年期间的 696 名患者(男性 286 名,女性 410 名,平均年龄 57.7±15.7 岁)。2019 年 ESC 风险分层的 30 天全因死亡率风险逐渐增加,高危组的风险大约是低危组的 6 倍[风险比:6.24(95%置信区间(CI),3.12,12.47),P<0.001]。PESI 风险分类的 30 天全因死亡率风险也随风险类别而增加,V 级的风险大约是 I 级的 6 倍[校正风险比:5.91(95% CI,2.25,15.51),P<0.001]。预测模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AuROC)最高的是 PESI 评分[AuROC=0.733(95% CI,0.685,0.782)]。
我们的研究在东南亚人群中代表了对 PESI 和 2019 年 ESC 风险分层的良好验证,以预测 APE 诊断后 30 天的死亡率。