Sulica Lucian
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2014 Jun;123(6):442-5. doi: 10.1177/0003489414527225.
This study aimed to identify voice disorders commonly misidentified as reflux and sources of such misattribution.
Retrospective chart review.
Twenty-six patients carrying a diagnosis of reflux alone presenting for second-opinion evaluation were identified from among 381 new patients presenting with a chief complaint of hoarseness over an 8-month period. Patients specifically referred for further workup were excluded.
Average duration of reflux treatment was 10.6 +/- 9.0 weeks. In no case was reflux alone the cause of hoarseness. Eleven (42%) had phonotraumatic lesions, 9 (34%) had neurologic disorders, 5 (19%) had age-related changes, and I (4%) was infectious. Twenty-two (85%) abnormalities were diagnosed by dynamic laryngeal examination with improved optics, including stroboscopy. Only 4 (15%) represented disorders routinely diagnosed with flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy.
Hoarse patients with no apparent cause for dysphonia other than reflux after flexible laryngoscopy, or who fail to improve with appropriate treatment, may benefit from further laryngeal investigation rather than continued empiric treatment or further reflux evaluation.
本研究旨在确定通常被误诊为胃食管反流的嗓音障碍以及此类误诊的原因。
回顾性病历审查。
在8个月期间因声音嘶哑为主诉前来就诊的381例新患者中,确定了26例仅诊断为胃食管反流且前来寻求二次诊断评估的患者。专门转诊进行进一步检查的患者被排除。
胃食管反流治疗的平均持续时间为10.6±9.0周。在所有病例中,胃食管反流都不是声音嘶哑的唯一原因。11例(42%)有发声创伤性病变,9例(34%)有神经系统疾病,5例(19%)有与年龄相关的变化,1例(4%)为感染性病变。22例(85%)的异常是通过动态喉镜检查(包括频闪喉镜检查)诊断出来的,该检查具有更好的光学效果。只有4例(15%)代表了通过软性纤维喉镜常规诊断的疾病。
在软性喉镜检查后,除胃食管反流外无明显发音障碍原因的声音嘶哑患者,或经适当治疗后未改善的患者,可能会从进一步的喉部检查中获益,而不是继续进行经验性治疗或进一步的胃食管反流评估。