Jüttemann A, Richter F, Wagner C, Dewey M
Promotionskolleg der Charité
Institut für Radiologie, Charité Campus Mitte.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2014 Apr;139(15):767-73. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1369897. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
The topic medical dissertation is often discussed controversially without quantitative data in Germany. The aim of this survey was to analyze the situation of doctoral students in medicine again after ten years.
Students at Charité - Berlin in their 11th to 14th semester completed an online survey about the progress and the support of their dissertations (n = 1081). The questionnaire included current and aborted dissertations.
The present evaluation had almost the same percentage of respondents (28 %) as in 2001 (31 %) and showed improvements in the preparation for scientific work by curricular courses (p < 0.001). 51 % were aware of the principles of good scientific practice in 2011, which was five times more than in 2001 (10 %, p < 0.001). The knowledge of the doctoral topics catalogue doubled in the same time (from 40 % to 81 %, p < 0.001). In addition the participants of the Charité graduate program felt better prepared for scientific work (p < 0.001). One third still criticized the insufficient funds for their doctoral projects. Another request was better training in statistics because 50 % received no statistical support during the pursue of their thesis.
The graduate program at Charité has been making a significant contribution towards improved preparation for scientific work and medical dissertations. However, there are still improvements necessary such as better financial support and statistical preparation of medical dissertations.
在德国,医学专业博士论文这一话题常常在缺乏定量数据的情况下引发争议性讨论。本次调查的目的是在十年后再次分析医学博士生的情况。
柏林夏里特医院第11至14学期的学生完成了一项关于其博士论文进展及所获支持的在线调查(n = 1081)。问卷涵盖了正在进行和已中止的博士论文。
本次评估的受访者比例(28%)与2001年(31%)几乎相同,且课程对科研工作准备的情况有所改善(p < 0.001)。2011年,51%的人了解良好科研实践原则,这是2001年(10%)的五倍(p < 0.001)。同时,对博士论文题目目录的了解翻倍(从40%增至81%,p < 0.001)。此外,夏里特研究生项目的参与者感觉为科研工作做好了更充分准备(p < 0.001)。仍有三分之一的人批评其博士项目资金不足。另一项诉求是加强统计学培训,因为50%的人在撰写论文期间未获得统计学支持。
夏里特的研究生项目为改善科研工作准备和医学博士论文做出了重大贡献。然而,仍有必要改进,如提供更好的资金支持以及医学博士论文的统计学准备。