Steffen Julius, Grabbert Markus, Pander Tanja, Gradel Maximilian, Köhler Lisa-Maria, Fischer Martin R, von der Borch Philip, Dimitriadis Konstantinos
Klinikum der Universität München, Institut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, München, Deutschland ; Klinikum der Universität München, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, München, Deutschland.
Klinikum der Universität München, Institut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, München, Deutschland ; Klinikum der Universität München, Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, München, Deutschland.
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2015 Aug 17;32(3):Doc29. doi: 10.3205/zma000971. eCollection 2015.
The importance of research, as promoted by the CanMEDS framework, is widely acknowledged. Many medical students in Germany work on a research project as part of their doctoral thesis whilst still going to medical school. However, a significant amount of projects are abandoned unfinished, which leads to substantial wastage of resources. One reason for this is an information deficit concerning undergraduate research projects.
To counteract this, we introduced an annual event at LMU Munich called DoktaMed with more than 600 visitors each year. It combines medical convention and research fair including keynote lectures, workshops and poster sessions as well as an exhibition of research groups and institutes. DoktaMed is a peer-to-peer event organized by a team of 40 students.
A needs analysis before its implementation underlined the information deficit as a possible cause for the high rate of abandoned projects. In the annual evaluation, visitors of DoktaMed rate the event with an average grade of 2.1 on a six-level Likert scale (n=558, SD=1.06, with "1=very good", "6=poor"). They stated to now feel better informed about the topic and regarded visiting DoktaMed as a worthwhile investment of time.
Students are generally satisfied with the event and feel better informed after visiting DoktaMed. However, many students never visit DoktaMed for various reasons. A possible improvement would be to present a greater number of clinical studies in addition to the laboratory work that DoktaMed focuses on now.
Evaluation after six years of DoktaMed is very promising. Visitors seem to be better informed. Nevertheless there is space for improvement in order to get more students and more faculty members involved. More studies are needed to assess long-term effects.
正如加拿大医学教育认证委员会(CanMEDS)框架所倡导的,研究的重要性已得到广泛认可。德国许多医学生在攻读医学院期间就将参与研究项目作为其博士论文的一部分。然而,大量项目半途而废,导致资源的大量浪费。其中一个原因是本科生研究项目的信息不足。
为解决这一问题,我们在慕尼黑大学(LMU)举办了一项年度活动——医学博士大会(DoktaMed),每年有600多名参观者。该活动将医学会议和研究展会相结合,包括主题演讲、研讨会、海报展示以及研究小组和机构的展览。DoktaMed是一个由40名学生组成的团队组织的同行交流活动。
在活动实施前进行的需求分析强调,信息不足可能是项目高废弃率的一个原因。在年度评估中,DoktaMed的参观者在六级李克特量表上对该活动的平均评分为2.1(n = 558,标准差 = 1.06,“1 = 非常好”,“6 = 差”)。他们表示现在对该主题有了更充分的了解,并认为参观DoktaMed是一项值得投入时间的活动。
学生们总体上对该活动感到满意,参观DoktaMed后也觉得信息更丰富了。然而,许多学生由于各种原因从未参观过DoktaMed。一个可能的改进是,除了目前DoktaMed所关注的实验室工作外,展示更多的临床研究。
DoktaMed开展六年之后的评估结果很有前景。参观者似乎了解得更充分了。然而,仍有改进的空间,以便让更多学生和教师参与进来。需要更多研究来评估长期效果。