• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Finding the right doctoral thesis - an innovative research fair for medical students.寻找合适的博士论文——一场面向医学生的创新研究展会。
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2015 Aug 17;32(3):Doc29. doi: 10.3205/zma000971. eCollection 2015.
2
The Doktabörse - an innovative online platform for research projects at the medical faculty of the LMU Munich.Doktabörse——慕尼黑大学医学院研究项目的创新在线平台。
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Aug 15;34(3):Doc30. doi: 10.3205/zma001107. eCollection 2017.
3
[Execution and quality of attention paid to medical doctoral theses at the faculty of medicine at the University of Würzburg as seen by the doctoral candidates in their 5th and 6th year of study].[维尔茨堡大学医学院的博士生在其学习的第五年和第六年对医学博士论文执行情况及关注质量的看法]
Gesundheitswesen. 2002 Jul;64(7):437-42. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32813.
4
[Doctoral thesis projects for medical students? Retrospective estimation of the fraction of successfully completed medical doctoral thesis projects at Witten/Herdecke University].[医学生的博士论文项目?对维滕/黑尔德克大学成功完成的医学博士论文项目比例的回顾性估计]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(10):618-23. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
5
[On the way to becoming an MD (Dr. med.): What kind of support do doctoral students need? Part 1: Survey and development of a program].[通往医学博士(Dr. med.)之路:博士生需要何种支持?第一部分:调查与项目开发]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2016;110-111:69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.12.004. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
6
Supervisors' perspective on medical thesis projects and dropout rates: survey among thesis supervisors at a large German university hospital.导师对医学论文项目及辍学率的看法:对德国一家大型大学医院的论文导师进行的调查
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 14;6(10):e012726. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012726.
7
Quality of faculty, students, curriculum and resources for nursing doctoral education in Korea: a focus group study.韩国护理博士教育的师资、学生、课程和资源质量:一项焦点小组研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):295-306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
8
[The German academic degree "Dr. med." is better than its reputation. Results of a questionnaire of doctoral students].[德国学术学位“医学博士”比其声誉更佳。博士生问卷调查结果]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2012 Nov;137(45):2311-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1327241. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
9
Doctoral students' perceived working environment, obstacles and opportunities at a Swedish medical faculty: a qualitative study.瑞典医学院博士生感知的工作环境、障碍和机遇:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 8;19(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1684-x.
10
Medical Research Volunteer Program (MRVP): innovative program promoting undergraduate research in the medical field.医学研究志愿者项目(MRVP):促进医学领域本科研究的创新项目。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jun 6;16:160. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0670-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring continuing medical education conference impact and attendee experience: a scoping review.衡量继续医学教育会议的影响和参会者体验:一项范围综述
Int J Med Educ. 2024 Feb 29;15:15-33. doi: 10.5116/ijme.65cc.8c88.
2
Studies on acceptance, evaluation and impact of the Cologne program "Research and Medical Studies".关于科隆“研究与医学研究”项目的接受度、评估及影响的研究
GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Feb 17;37(1):Doc5. doi: 10.3205/zma001298. eCollection 2020.
3
Contemporary global perspectives of medical students on research during undergraduate medical education: a systematic literature review.当代医学生对本科医学教育期间科研的全球观点:系统文献回顾。
Med Educ Online. 2018 Dec;23(1):1537430. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1537430.
4
The Doktabörse - an innovative online platform for research projects at the medical faculty of the LMU Munich.Doktabörse——慕尼黑大学医学院研究项目的创新在线平台。
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Aug 15;34(3):Doc30. doi: 10.3205/zma001107. eCollection 2017.
5
Supervisors' perspective on medical thesis projects and dropout rates: survey among thesis supervisors at a large German university hospital.导师对医学论文项目及辍学率的看法:对德国一家大型大学医院的论文导师进行的调查
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 14;6(10):e012726. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012726.

本文引用的文献

1
[Development of the situation of doctoral students in medicine: Results of two surveys at an interval of ten years (2001 and 2011)].[医学博士生情况的发展:相隔十年(2001年和2011年)的两项调查结果]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2014 Apr;139(15):767-73. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1369897. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
2
[The German academic degree "Dr. med." is better than its reputation. Results of a questionnaire of doctoral students].[德国学术学位“医学博士”比其声誉更佳。博士生问卷调查结果]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2012 Nov;137(45):2311-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1327241. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
3
Criteria for the successful completion of medical dissertations - A multicenter study.医学博士论文成功完成的标准——一项多中心研究。
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2010;27(3):Doc45. doi: 10.3205/zma000682. Epub 2010 May 17.
4
Are some of the challenging aspects of the CanMEDS roles valid outside Canada?加拿大医学教育角色(CanMEDS)中的一些具有挑战性的方面在加拿大境外是否也适用?
Med Educ. 2006 Aug;40(8):807-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02525.x.
5
Why German medical students abandon dissertations.德国医科学生为何放弃撰写博士论文。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2000;13(1):97-100. doi: 10.1080/135762800110637.
6
[Medical dissertation: differences between successful and aborted research projects].[医学博士论文:成功与失败的研究项目之间的差异]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2002 Jun 14;127(24):1307-11. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32193.
7
The German medical dissertation--time to change?德国医学博士论文——是时候做出改变了吗?
Acad Med. 2000 Aug;75(8):861-3. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200008000-00024.

寻找合适的博士论文——一场面向医学生的创新研究展会。

Finding the right doctoral thesis - an innovative research fair for medical students.

作者信息

Steffen Julius, Grabbert Markus, Pander Tanja, Gradel Maximilian, Köhler Lisa-Maria, Fischer Martin R, von der Borch Philip, Dimitriadis Konstantinos

机构信息

Klinikum der Universität München, Institut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, München, Deutschland ; Klinikum der Universität München, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, München, Deutschland.

Klinikum der Universität München, Institut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, München, Deutschland ; Klinikum der Universität München, Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, München, Deutschland.

出版信息

GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2015 Aug 17;32(3):Doc29. doi: 10.3205/zma000971. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.3205/zma000971
PMID:26413167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4580439/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The importance of research, as promoted by the CanMEDS framework, is widely acknowledged. Many medical students in Germany work on a research project as part of their doctoral thesis whilst still going to medical school. However, a significant amount of projects are abandoned unfinished, which leads to substantial wastage of resources. One reason for this is an information deficit concerning undergraduate research projects.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

To counteract this, we introduced an annual event at LMU Munich called DoktaMed with more than 600 visitors each year. It combines medical convention and research fair including keynote lectures, workshops and poster sessions as well as an exhibition of research groups and institutes. DoktaMed is a peer-to-peer event organized by a team of 40 students.

RESULTS

A needs analysis before its implementation underlined the information deficit as a possible cause for the high rate of abandoned projects. In the annual evaluation, visitors of DoktaMed rate the event with an average grade of 2.1 on a six-level Likert scale (n=558, SD=1.06, with "1=very good", "6=poor"). They stated to now feel better informed about the topic and regarded visiting DoktaMed as a worthwhile investment of time.

DISCUSSION

Students are generally satisfied with the event and feel better informed after visiting DoktaMed. However, many students never visit DoktaMed for various reasons. A possible improvement would be to present a greater number of clinical studies in addition to the laboratory work that DoktaMed focuses on now.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation after six years of DoktaMed is very promising. Visitors seem to be better informed. Nevertheless there is space for improvement in order to get more students and more faculty members involved. More studies are needed to assess long-term effects.

摘要

引言

正如加拿大医学教育认证委员会(CanMEDS)框架所倡导的,研究的重要性已得到广泛认可。德国许多医学生在攻读医学院期间就将参与研究项目作为其博士论文的一部分。然而,大量项目半途而废,导致资源的大量浪费。其中一个原因是本科生研究项目的信息不足。

项目描述

为解决这一问题,我们在慕尼黑大学(LMU)举办了一项年度活动——医学博士大会(DoktaMed),每年有600多名参观者。该活动将医学会议和研究展会相结合,包括主题演讲、研讨会、海报展示以及研究小组和机构的展览。DoktaMed是一个由40名学生组成的团队组织的同行交流活动。

结果

在活动实施前进行的需求分析强调,信息不足可能是项目高废弃率的一个原因。在年度评估中,DoktaMed的参观者在六级李克特量表上对该活动的平均评分为2.1(n = 558,标准差 = 1.06,“1 = 非常好”,“6 = 差”)。他们表示现在对该主题有了更充分的了解,并认为参观DoktaMed是一项值得投入时间的活动。

讨论

学生们总体上对该活动感到满意,参观DoktaMed后也觉得信息更丰富了。然而,许多学生由于各种原因从未参观过DoktaMed。一个可能的改进是,除了目前DoktaMed所关注的实验室工作外,展示更多的临床研究。

结论

DoktaMed开展六年之后的评估结果很有前景。参观者似乎了解得更充分了。然而,仍有改进的空间,以便让更多学生和教师参与进来。需要更多研究来评估长期效果。