Akin Yigit, Gulmez Hakan, Ates Mutlu, Bozkurt Aliseydi, Nuhoglu Baris
Harran University School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
Department of Family Medicine, Baskent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013 Oct;15(10):e13805. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.13805. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
Premature ejaculation (PE) is the most common sexual disorder in men and studies reported prevalence up to 30% (1, 2). PE is not a life-threatening medical condition but it influences the quality of life (QoL).
The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency, and safety of alpha blocker drugs in the treatment of patients with premature ejaculation (PE). Additionally we investigated the quality of life (QoL) in patients with PE who were treated with alpha blocker drugs.
This study was a pilot clinical trial. Prospectively documented 108 patients with PE were treated and were followed-up in urology outpatient clinic. All patients were divided into 5 groups according to used alpha blocker agents which were determined by simple randomization. Silodosin 4mg (Group 1, n = 21), tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.4mg (Group 2, n = 23), alfuzosin 10mg (Group 3, n = 22), terazosin 5mg (Group 4, n = 21), doksazosin mesylate 4mg (Group5, n = 21), were used for treatment. The demographic parameters of patients, pre and post treatment intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT), PE Profile (PEP), and QoL index were recorded and evaluated. Effectiveness of treatment was evaluated by measuring IELT. Additionally, side effects of drugs were recorded. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
All alpha blocker drugs were statistically effective for preventing PE. Notably, silodosin seemed to be more effective for preventing PE than other alpha blockers (P < 0.05). However all alpha blockers provided development in QoL scores, silodosin was a little better than other drugs in statistical analyses. Furthermore statistical increase in IELT and decrease in PEP were provided more in Group 1 than other groups (P < 0.05).
Silodosin seems to be able to even more prevent PE. Silodosin may provide development in QoL than other alpha blocker agents. Additionally, lower systemic adverse events and more effectivity are the prominent features of silodosin in PE.This study was a pilot clinical trial. Prospectively documented 108 patients with PE were treated and were followed-up in urology outpatient clinic. All patients were divided into 5 groups according to used alpha blocker agents which were determined by simple randomization. Silodosin 4mg (Group 1, n = 21), tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.4mg (Group 2, n = 23), alfuzosin 10mg (Group 3, n = 22), terazosin 5mg (Group 4, n = 21), doksazosin mesylate 4mg (Group5, n = 21), were used for treatment. The demographic parameters of patients, pre and post treatment intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT), PE Profile (PEP), and QoL index were recorded and evaluated. Effectiveness of treatment was evaluated by measuring IELT. Additionally, side effects of drugs were recorded. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
早泄(PE)是男性中最常见的性功能障碍,研究报告其患病率高达30%(1,2)。早泄并非危及生命的疾病,但会影响生活质量(QoL)。
本研究旨在比较α受体阻滞剂药物治疗早泄(PE)患者的疗效和安全性。此外,我们还调查了接受α受体阻滞剂药物治疗的PE患者的生活质量(QoL)。
本研究为一项试点临床试验。前瞻性记录了108例PE患者并在泌尿外科门诊进行治疗和随访。所有患者根据使用的α受体阻滞剂药物通过简单随机化分为5组。使用西洛多辛4mg(第1组,n = 21)、盐酸坦索罗辛0.4mg(第2组,n = 23)、阿夫唑嗪10mg(第3组,n = 22)、特拉唑嗪5mg(第4组,n = 21)、甲磺酸多沙唑嗪4mg(第5组,n = 21)进行治疗。记录并评估患者的人口统计学参数、治疗前后的阴道内射精潜伏期(IELT)、早泄概况(PEP)和生活质量指数。通过测量IELT评估治疗效果。此外,记录药物的副作用。P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
所有α受体阻滞剂药物在预防PE方面均具有统计学有效性。值得注意的是,西洛多辛在预防PE方面似乎比其他α受体阻滞剂更有效(P < 0.05)。然而,所有α受体阻滞剂均使生活质量评分得到改善,在统计分析中西洛多辛比其他药物略好。此外,第1组的IELT统计学增加和PEP降低比其他组更多(P < 0.05)。
西洛多辛似乎能更有效地预防PE。与其他α受体阻滞剂相比,西洛多辛可能在改善生活质量方面更具优势。此外,较低的全身不良事件发生率和更高的有效性是西洛多辛治疗PE的突出特点。本研究为一项试点临床试验。前瞻性记录了108例PE患者并在泌尿外科门诊进行治疗和随访。所有患者根据使用的α受体阻滞剂药物通过简单随机化分为5组。使用西洛多辛4mg(第1组,n = 21)、盐酸坦索罗辛0.4mg(第2组,n = 23)、阿夫唑嗪10mg(第3组,n = 22)、特拉唑嗪5mg(第4组,n = 21)、甲磺酸多沙唑嗪4mg(第5组,n = 21)进行治疗。记录并评估患者的人口统计学参数、治疗前后的阴道内射精潜伏期(IELT)、早泄概况(PEP)和生活质量指数。通过测量IELT评估治疗效果。此外,记录药物的副作用。P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。