Bedi Gillinder, Cecchi Guillermo A, Slezak Diego F, Carrillo Facundo, Sigman Mariano, de Wit Harriet
1] Division on Substance Abuse, New York State Psychiatric Institute, and Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA [2] Human Behavioral Pharmacology Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Computational Biology Center-Neuroscience, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014 Sep;39(10):2340-8. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.80. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
Abused drugs can profoundly alter mental states in ways that may motivate drug use. These effects are usually assessed with self-report, an approach that is vulnerable to biases. Analyzing speech during intoxication may present a more direct, objective measure, offering a unique 'window' into the mind. Here, we employed computational analyses of speech semantic and topological structure after ±3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA; 'ecstasy') and methamphetamine in 13 ecstasy users. In 4 sessions, participants completed a 10-min speech task after MDMA (0.75 and 1.5 mg/kg), methamphetamine (20 mg), or placebo. Latent Semantic Analyses identified the semantic proximity between speech content and concepts relevant to drug effects. Graph-based analyses identified topological speech characteristics. Group-level drug effects on semantic distances and topology were assessed. Machine-learning analyses (with leave-one-out cross-validation) assessed whether speech characteristics could predict drug condition in the individual subject. Speech after MDMA (1.5 mg/kg) had greater semantic proximity than placebo to the concepts friend, support, intimacy, and rapport. Speech on MDMA (0.75 mg/kg) had greater proximity to empathy than placebo. Conversely, speech on methamphetamine was further from compassion than placebo. Classifiers discriminated between MDMA (1.5 mg/kg) and placebo with 88% accuracy, and MDMA (1.5 mg/kg) and methamphetamine with 84% accuracy. For the two MDMA doses, the classifier performed at chance. These data suggest that automated semantic speech analyses can capture subtle alterations in mental state, accurately discriminating between drugs. The findings also illustrate the potential for automated speech-based approaches to characterize clinically relevant alterations to mental state, including those occurring in psychiatric illness.
滥用药物可通过多种方式深刻改变精神状态,这些方式可能会促使人们使用药物。这些影响通常通过自我报告来评估,而这种方法容易受到偏差的影响。分析中毒期间的言语可能会提供一种更直接、客观的测量方法,为了解大脑提供一个独特的“窗口”。在此,我们对13名摇头丸使用者在服用±3,4-亚甲基二氧基甲基苯丙胺(MDMA;“摇头丸”)和甲基苯丙胺后言语的语义和拓扑结构进行了计算分析。在4个实验环节中,参与者在服用MDMA(0.75和1.5毫克/千克)、甲基苯丙胺(20毫克)或安慰剂后完成了一项10分钟的言语任务。潜在语义分析确定了言语内容与药物效应相关概念之间的语义接近度。基于图形的分析确定了言语的拓扑特征。评估了药物对语义距离和拓扑结构的组水平效应。机器学习分析(采用留一法交叉验证)评估了言语特征是否能够预测个体受试者的药物状态。服用MDMA(1.5毫克/千克)后的言语与“朋友”“支持”“亲密”和“融洽关系”等概念的语义接近度高于安慰剂。服用MDMA(0.75毫克/千克)后的言语与“同理心”的接近度高于安慰剂。相反,服用甲基苯丙胺后的言语与“同情”的距离比安慰剂更远。分类器区分MDMA(1.5毫克/千克)和安慰剂的准确率为88%,区分MDMA(1.5毫克/千克)和甲基苯丙胺的准确率为84%。对于两种MDMA剂量,分类器的表现处于随机水平。这些数据表明,自动化语义言语分析可以捕捉精神状态的细微变化,准确区分不同药物。研究结果还说明了基于言语的自动化方法在表征与临床相关的精神状态改变方面的潜力,包括发生在精神疾病中的改变。