Kunz Cornelia Ursula, Friede Tim, Parsons Nicholas, Todd Susan, Stallard Nigel
a Warwick Medical School , University of Warwick , Coventry , United Kingdom.
J Biopharm Stat. 2015;25(1):170-89. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2013.840646.
In an adaptive seamless phase II/III clinical trial interim analysis, data are used for treatment selection, enabling resources to be focused on comparison of more effective treatment(s) with a control. In this paper, we compare two methods recently proposed to enable use of short-term endpoint data for decision-making at the interim analysis. The comparison focuses on the power and the probability of correctly identifying the most promising treatment. We show that the choice of method depends on how well short-term data predict the best treatment, which may be measured by the correlation between treatment effects on short- and long-term endpoints.
在适应性无缝II/III期临床试验中期分析中,数据用于治疗选择,从而使资源能够集中于将更有效的治疗方法与对照进行比较。在本文中,我们比较了最近提出的两种方法,以便在中期分析时能够使用短期终点数据进行决策。比较的重点是功效以及正确识别最有前景治疗方法的概率。我们表明,方法的选择取决于短期数据对最佳治疗方法的预测程度,这可以通过短期和长期终点治疗效果之间的相关性来衡量。