Suppr超能文献

当代职业治疗实践:基于证据和哲学一致性的挑战。

Contemporary occupational therapy practice: the challenges of being evidence based and philosophically congruent.

作者信息

Gustafsson Louise, Molineux Matthew, Bennett Sally

出版信息

Aust Occup Ther J. 2014 Apr;61(2):121-3. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12110.

Abstract

Several authors have written of the need to embrace occupation and use it to energise our practice, research and education for the benefit of the profession, individual occupational therapists and ultimately, and most significantly, our clients. However, Wilcock (1999) best summarises the issues and the work that must be done, calling for the profession to adopt a consistent professional philosophy. This approach is entirely congruent with the paradigm approach proposed by Kielhofner (2009). Reinforcing the ideas of Doris Sym, Wilcock (p. 192) states that ‘the first essential for each individual in any profession is the acceptance of a philosophy that is the profession’s keystone.’ Wilcock is clear that such a philosophy should not be adopted and enacted in a rigid way, but it should be dynamic so as to enable the profession to respond to research and theories, and changes in the world. In essence, a professional philosophy should guide research, education and practice and be a touchstone when considering potential changes to practice. It is our suggestion that occupational therapists, individually and collectively, need to use our occupational philosophy, currently best operationalised by the Contemporary Paradigm, to inform EBP. In conclusion, we again find ourselves at a cross road for the profession with the occupational philosophy of the Contemporary Paradigm at times challenged by the adoption of research evidence into practice. We would encourage all occupational therapists to engage in EBP but do so ever mindful of its complexity. We would suggest that evidence-based decision making is viewed through the lens of the occupational therapy philosophy, with occupational therapists critically questioning whether or not the ‘procedure’ for which there is evidence is consistent with the Contemporary Paradigm. This is a complex matter, with many remaining issues to be explored. We would encourage all occupational therapists to interrogate the ways in which they implement EBP and consider the extent to which the profession’s philosophy guides practice decisions.

摘要

几位作者都写到了接纳职业并利用它来为我们的实践、研究和教育注入活力的必要性,这对整个职业、个体职业治疗师乃至最终最重要的是我们的客户都有益处。然而,威尔科克(1999年)对这些问题以及必须开展的工作进行了最佳总结,呼吁该职业采用一种一致的专业理念。这种方法与基尔霍夫纳(2009年)提出的范式方法完全一致。威尔科克(第192页)强化了多丽丝·西姆的观点,指出“任何职业中每个个体的首要关键是接受一种作为该职业基石的理念”。威尔科克明确表示,这样的理念不应以僵化的方式被采纳和实施,而应是动态的,以便使该职业能够应对研究、理论以及世界的变化。从本质上讲,一种专业理念应该指导研究、教育和实践,并在考虑实践的潜在变化时成为试金石。我们的建议是,职业治疗师个人和集体都需要运用我们的职业理念(目前由当代范式得到最佳实施)来为循证实践提供信息。总之,我们再次发现该职业处于一个十字路口,当代范式的职业理念有时会因将研究证据应用于实践而受到挑战。我们鼓励所有职业治疗师参与循证实践,但要始终意识到其复杂性。我们建议循证决策应从职业治疗理念的角度来审视,职业治疗师要批判性地质疑有证据支持的“程序”是否与当代范式一致。这是一个复杂的问题,还有许多问题有待探索。我们鼓励所有职业治疗师审视他们实施循证实践的方式,并思考该职业的理念在多大程度上指导实践决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验