Ghahramani Sahar, Larson Sophia C, L'Hotta Allison J, Harris Kelly M, Lipsey Kim, Geng Elvin H, Juckett Lisa A, Hoyt Catherine R
Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Jan 7;6(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00690-w.
Approximately one in six children has a disability, and effective, evidence-based rehabilitation can ameliorate the impact of these conditions over the lifespan. However, implementing interventions in real-world settings remains a challenge. This scoping review aimed to summarize the characteristics, implementation strategies, and outcomes of implementation studies in pediatric rehabilitation.
A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science from the database inception to December 2, 2022. Studies testing implementation strategies in pediatric rehabilitation interventions were included. Data extracted included study characteristics (e.g., country, intervention type, field of rehabilitation), implementation strategies characterized using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy, and outcomes based on the Implementation Outcomes Framework.
Of the 11,740 studies identified, 44 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in the United States (n = 15, 34%) or Canada (n = 10, 23%) and used a mixed-methods design (n = 13, 30%). Interventions primarily targeted motor skills (n = 19, 43%) and were conducted in outpatient settings (n = 14, 32%) or homes (n = 11, 23%). The most commonly used implementation strategies were "train and educate key informant" (n = 21, 48%) and "use evaluative/iterative strategies" (n = 19, 43%). Feasibility (n = 19, 43%) and acceptability (n = 16, 36%) were the most frequently targeted implementation outcomes.
Reporting implementation strategies and outcomes in pediatric rehabilitation studies is limited and highly variable. Most strategies focused on developing and sharing educational materials, while administrative and systems-level interventions were largely absent. Standardized documentation of implementation strategies and outcomes could advance the field's understanding of the effective development of interventions designed for implementation, encouraging faster uptake of effective interventions.
约六分之一的儿童存在残疾,有效的循证康复可在整个生命周期改善这些状况的影响。然而,在现实环境中实施干预措施仍是一项挑战。本综述旨在总结儿科康复实施研究的特征、实施策略及结果。
从数据库建库至2022年12月2日,在PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、SCOPUS和Web of Science中进行全面检索。纳入测试儿科康复干预实施策略的研究。提取的数据包括研究特征(如国家、干预类型、康复领域)、使用实施变革专家建议分类法表征的实施策略,以及基于实施结果框架的结果。
在11740项检索到的研究中,44项符合纳入标准。大多数研究在美国(n = 15,34%)或加拿大(n = 10,23%)开展,采用混合方法设计(n = 13,30%)。干预主要针对运动技能(n = 19,43%),在门诊环境(n = 14,32%)或家庭(n = 11,23%)中进行。最常用的实施策略是“培训和教育关键信息提供者”(n = 21,48%)和“使用评估/迭代策略”(n = 19,43%)。可行性(n = 19,43%)和可接受性(n = 16,36%)是最常针对的实施结果。
儿科康复研究中实施策略和结果的报告有限且差异很大。大多数策略侧重于开发和共享教育材料,而行政和系统层面的干预措施基本缺失。实施策略和结果的标准化记录可促进该领域对为实施而设计的有效干预措施的有效开发的理解,鼓励更快采用有效干预措施。