• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CABG versus PCI in diabetic patients with multivessel disease after risk stratification by the SYNTAX score: a pooled analysis of the SYNTAX and FREEDOM trials.

作者信息

Capodanno Davide, Capranzano Piera, Tamburino Corrado

机构信息

Ferrarotto Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Ferrarotto Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2014 May 15;173(3):548-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.03.077. Epub 2014 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.03.077
PMID:24698250
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
CABG versus PCI in diabetic patients with multivessel disease after risk stratification by the SYNTAX score: a pooled analysis of the SYNTAX and FREEDOM trials.
Int J Cardiol. 2014 May 15;173(3):548-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.03.077. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
2
Improved long-term survival for diabetic patients with surgical versus interventional revascularization.手术与介入性血管重建术相比，糖尿病患者的长期生存率得到提高。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Apr;99(4):1298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.11.035. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
3
Treatment of complex coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes: 5-year results comparing outcomes of bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in the SYNTAX trial.糖尿病患者复杂冠状动脉疾病的治疗：SYNTAX 试验比较旁路手术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 5 年结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 May;43(5):1006-13. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt017. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
4
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对三血管病变患者的比较：SYNTAX 试验的最终五年随访结果。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 21;35(40):2821-30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu213. Epub 2014 May 21.
5
Validity of SYNTAX score II for risk stratification of percutaneous coronary interventions: A patient-level pooled analysis of 5,433 patients enrolled in contemporary coronary stent trials.SYNTAX评分II在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗风险分层中的有效性：对当代冠状动脉支架试验中纳入的5433例患者的个体水平汇总分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2015;187:111-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.248. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
6
One-stop hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease: 3-year follow-up results from a single institution.一站式杂交冠状动脉血运重建与冠状动脉旁路移植术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗多支冠状动脉疾病：来自单中心的 3 年随访结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 25;61(25):2525-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
7
Long-term forecasting and comparison of mortality in the Evaluation of the Xience Everolimus Eluting Stent vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization (EXCEL) trial: prospective validation of the SYNTAX Score II.EXCEL 试验中依维莫司洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干血运重建效果的长期预测和死亡率比较：SYNTAX 评分 II 的前瞻性验证。
Eur Heart J. 2015 May 21;36(20):1231-41. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu518. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
8
Five-year outcomes in patients with left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting in the synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery trial.在紫杉醇药物涂层支架与心脏搭桥术联合治疗左主干病变研究中，经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干病变患者的 5 年结果。
Circulation. 2014 Jun 10;129(23):2388-94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006689. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
9
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with 3-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: final results from the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与旁路手术治疗 3 支血管病变或左主干病变患者的成本效益：紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏手术（SYNTAX）试验的最终结果。
Circulation. 2014 Sep 30;130(14):1146-57. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009985. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
10
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis (5-year outcomes of the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术在需要透析的终末期肾病患者中的比较（CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG 登记研究队列-2 的 5 年结果）。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 15;114(4):555-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.034. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Stenting versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Stable Coronary Artery Disease.稳定性冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗加支架置入术与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较
Int J Angiol. 2021 Aug 31;30(3):221-227. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735238. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Coronary revascularization strategies in patients with multivessel disease: is it all about diabetes?多支血管病变患者的冠状动脉血运重建策略：一切都与糖尿病有关吗？
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Jun;7(3):E1-E3. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2016.12.02.
3
Effect of coronary artery revascularization on in-hospital outcomes and long-term prognoses in acute myocardial infarction patients with prior ischemic stroke.
冠状动脉血运重建对既往有缺血性卒中的急性心肌梗死患者住院结局及长期预后的影响。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016 Feb;13(2):145-51. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2015.06.017.