Suppr超能文献

一站式杂交冠状动脉血运重建与冠状动脉旁路移植术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗多支冠状动脉疾病:来自单中心的 3 年随访结果。

One-stop hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease: 3-year follow-up results from a single institution.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, China & Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 25;61(25):2525-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 Apr 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare midterm clinical outcomes of 1-stop hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND

One-stop HCR has emerged to be a feasible and attractive alternative to CABG and PCI in selected patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

METHODS

From June 2007 to December 2010, 141 consecutive patients underwent 1-stop HCR at Fuwai Hospital. Using propensity score methodology, these patients were matched with 2 separate groups of 141 patients who underwent isolated CABG or PCI during the same period. All patients were stratified by the EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation Score) and the SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score. Cutoffs for EuroSCORE (low, ≤2; medium, >2 and <6; high, ≥6) and SYNTAX score (low, ≤24; medium, >24 and <30; high, ≥30) were identified by tertiles. Three groups' cumulative major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) rates in each risk tertile were compared.

RESULTS

One-stop HCR incurred MACCE rate lower than that with PCI (p < 0.001), but similar to that with CABG (p = 0.140). After stratification by EuroSCORE or SYNTAX score, the cumulative MACCE rates were similar among the 3 groups in low and medium tertiles. But in the high EuroSCORE tertile, patients who underwent 1-stop HCR had a lower MACCE rate than did the groups that underwent CABG (p = 0.030) and PCI (p = 0.006). Meanwhile, patients with a high SYNTAX score who underwent 1-stop HCR had a MACCE rate lower than did those who underwent PCI (p = 0.002), but similar to that of those who underwent CABG (p = 0.362).

CONCLUSIONS

One-stop HCR provides favorable midterm outcomes for selected patients with multivessel coronary artery disease in each risk tertile. For patients with high EuroSCORE or SYNTAX score, it might provide a promising alternative to CABG and PCI.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较一站式杂交冠状动脉血运重建(HCR)与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗多支血管病变的中期临床结果。

背景

在多支血管病变的患者中,一站式 HCR 已成为一种可行且有吸引力的 CABG 和 PCI 替代方法。

方法

2007 年 6 月至 2010 年 12 月,141 例连续患者在阜外医院行一站式 HCR。采用倾向评分法,将这些患者与同期 141 例单独行 CABG 或 PCI 的患者分为两组。所有患者按欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)和 SYNTAX(紫杉醇与心脏手术联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的协同作用)评分分层。通过三分位数确定 EuroSCORE(低,≤2;中,>2 且<6;高,≥6)和 SYNTAX 评分(低,≤24;中,>24 且<30;高,≥30)的截断值。比较每组患者在每个风险三分位数中的主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)累积发生率。

结果

一站式 HCR 的 MACCE 发生率低于 PCI(p<0.001),但与 CABG 相似(p=0.140)。根据 EuroSCORE 或 SYNTAX 评分分层后,在低危和中危三分位组中,三组的累积 MACCE 发生率相似。但在高危 EuroSCORE 三分位组中,行一站式 HCR 的患者的 MACCE 发生率低于 CABG 组(p=0.030)和 PCI 组(p=0.006)。同时,行一站式 HCR 的高危 SYNTAX 评分患者的 MACCE 发生率低于 PCI 组(p=0.002),但与 CABG 组相似(p=0.362)。

结论

一站式 HCR 为多支血管病变患者在每个风险三分位中提供了良好的中期结果。对于高危 EuroSCORE 或 SYNTAX 评分的患者,它可能为 CABG 和 PCI 提供一种有前途的替代方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验