Suppr超能文献

益生菌与特应性皮炎的一级预防:随机对照研究的荟萃分析

Probiotics and primary prevention of atopic dermatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

作者信息

Panduru M, Panduru N M, Sălăvăstru C M, Tiplica G-S

机构信息

2nd Dermatology Chair, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.

2nd Clinic Department, Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases Chair, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.

出版信息

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Feb;29(2):232-242. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12496. Epub 2014 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atopic Dermatitis (AD) has an increasing incidence and the real cause of the disease is not known yet. Probiotics may be involved in AD prevention, but their role is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the role of probiotics in AD occurrence.

METHODS

We carried out an extensive search on this topic in the international databases (Pubmed, Scopus,Web of knowledge, EBSCO, ARTO, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov.) selecting only those studies where the role of probiotics in AD occurrence was analysed. For the selected studies we calculated odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CIs).

RESULTS

Initially, we found 1513 articles, of which only 26 studies fulfilled our criteria. After exclusion of studies on the same populations, 16 studies were included in the final analysis. The meta-analysis of these studies revealed that probiotics administration confers protection against AD occurrence (OR = 0.64, P < 0.001). The subgroup meta-analysis, in general population and population at high risk for allergies, suggested that probiotics administration is protective for AD development in both subgroups (OR = 0.53, P = 0.005; OR = 0.66, P < 0.001). Additional subgroup analysis showed that probiotics prenatal administration followed by postnatal administration was protective (OR = 0.61, P < 0.001) unlike only administration in postnatal period (OR = 0.95, P < 0.82). Finally, the subgroup analysis based on the type of treatment suggested that both Lactobacillus alone and Lactobacillus with Bifidobacterium are protective against AD (OR = 0.70, P = 0.004; OR = 0.62, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Probiotics seem to have a protective role in AD prevention if there are administration in pre and postnatal period in both general and allergic risk population.

摘要

背景

特应性皮炎(AD)的发病率呈上升趋势,但其真正病因尚不清楚。益生菌可能与AD的预防有关,但其作用存在争议。

目的

本研究旨在评估益生菌在AD发生中的作用。

方法

我们在国际数据库(PubMed、Scopus、Web of knowledge、EBSCO、ARTO、Google Scholar、ClinicalTrials.gov)中对该主题进行了广泛搜索,仅选择那些分析了益生菌在AD发生中作用的研究。对于所选研究,我们计算了比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CIs)。

结果

最初,我们找到1513篇文章,其中只有26项研究符合我们的标准。在排除对相同人群的研究后,最终分析纳入了16项研究。这些研究的荟萃分析表明,服用益生菌可预防AD的发生(OR = 0.64,P < 0.001)。在一般人群和过敏高风险人群中的亚组荟萃分析表明,服用益生菌对这两个亚组的AD发展均有保护作用(OR = 0.53,P = 0.005;OR = 0.66,P < 0.001)。进一步的亚组分析表明,与仅在产后服用益生菌(OR = 0.95,P < 0.82)不同,产前和产后均服用益生菌具有保护作用(OR = 0.61,P < 0.001)。最后,基于治疗类型的亚组分析表明,单独使用乳酸杆菌和乳酸杆菌与双歧杆菌联合使用均对AD有保护作用(OR = 0.70,P = 0.004;OR = 0.62,P < 0.001)。

结论

在一般人群和过敏风险人群中,若在产前和产后均服用益生菌,益生菌似乎在AD预防中具有保护作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验