Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South UniversityChangsha, China.
Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityChangsha, China.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017 Sep 6;7:392. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00392. eCollection 2017.
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent, burdensome, and psychologically important pediatric concern. Probiotics have been suggested as a treatment for AD. Some reports have explored this topic; however, the utility of probiotics for AD remains to be firmly established. To assess the effects of probiotics on AD in children, the PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library Scopus, and OVID databases were searched for reports published in the English language. Thirteen studies were identified. Significantly higher SCORAD values favoring probiotics over controls were observed (mean difference [MD], -3.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.12 to -0.03; < 0.001). The reported efficacy of probiotics in children < 1 year old was -1.03 (95%CI, -7.05 to 4.99) and that in children 1-18 years old was -4.50 (95%CI, -7.45 to -1.54; < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that in Europe, SCORAD revealed no effect of probiotics, whereas significantly lower SCORAD values were reported in Asia (MD, -5.39; 95%CI, -8.91 to -1.87). GG (MD, 3.29; 95%CI, -0.30 to 6.88; = 0.07) and (MD, -0.70; 95%CI, -2.30 to 0.90; = 0.39) showed no significant effect on SCORAD values in children with AD. However, (MD, -11.42; 95%CI, -13.81 to -9.04), (MD, -7.21; 95%CI, -9.63 to -4.78), and a mixture of different strains (MD, -3.52; 95%CI, -5.61 to -1.44) showed significant effects on SCORAD values in children with AD. Our meta-analysis indicated that the research to date has not robustly shown that probiotics are beneficial for children with AD. However, caution is needed when generalizing our results, as the populations evaluated were heterogeneous. Randomized controlled trials with larger samples and greater power are necessary to identify the species, dose, and treatment duration of probiotics that are most efficacious for treating AD in children.
特应性皮炎(AD)是一种普遍存在的、负担沉重的、具有重要心理影响的儿科疾病。益生菌被认为是 AD 的一种治疗方法。一些报告已经探讨了这个话题;然而,益生菌在 AD 中的效用仍有待确定。为了评估益生菌对儿童 AD 的影响,我们在 PubMed/Medline、Cochrane 图书馆 Scopus 和 OVID 数据库中搜索了以英文发表的报告。确定了 13 项研究。与对照组相比,益生菌显著降低 SCORAD 值(平均差异 [MD],-3.07;95%置信区间 [CI],-6.12 至-0.03;<0.001)。报道益生菌在<1 岁儿童中的疗效为-1.03(95%CI,-7.05 至 4.99),在 1-18 岁儿童中为-4.50(95%CI,-7.45 至-1.54;<0.001)。亚组分析显示,在欧洲,益生菌对 SCORAD 没有影响,而在亚洲报道的 SCORAD 值明显较低(MD,-5.39;95%CI,-8.91 至-1.87)。GG(MD,3.29;95%CI,-0.30 至 6.88;=0.07)和(MD,-0.70;95%CI,-2.30 至 0.90;=0.39)对 AD 儿童的 SCORAD 值没有显著影响。然而,(MD,-11.42;95%CI,-13.81 至-9.04)、(MD,-7.21;95%CI,-9.63 至-4.78)和混合不同菌株(MD,-3.52;95%CI,-5.61 至-1.44)对 AD 儿童的 SCORAD 值有显著影响。我们的荟萃分析表明,迄今为止的研究并没有强有力地表明益生菌对 AD 儿童有益。然而,当推广我们的结果时需要谨慎,因为评估的人群是异质的。需要更大样本量和更高效能的随机对照试验来确定最有效的益生菌种类、剂量和治疗时间,以治疗儿童 AD。