Jacquet Gabrielle A, Hansoti Bhakti, Levine Adam C, Martin Ian B K
Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;47(3):348-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.01.029. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
Increasing numbers of emergency medicine (EM) residents and fellows are completing additional training with the intention of pursuing careers in global emergency medicine (GEM). At the same time, many academic emergency departments (EDs) are investing in the development of GEM divisions and global/international EM fellowship programs. However, the path for a successful career in this subspecialty has still not been defined.
Our aim was to survey emergency physicians engaged in GEM in order to characterize their practice patterns and career paths, and to identify barriers to a successful career.
An online survey assessing demographics, timing and content of work, financing and barriers, and academic productivity was deployed to emergency physicians. Descriptive statistics were analyzed using STATA software.
A total of 116 attending emergency physicians responded. Female respondents tended to be younger (51% vs. 27%; p = 0.012). Younger respondents were more likely to have completed advanced GEM training (20% vs. 7%; p = 0.037). Most (73%) respondents spent fewer than 3 months annually abroad. Self funding was the most common (47%) source of funding, while only 16% reported receiving grant support. Lack of time and funding were the most commonly encountered barriers to a career in GEM (64% and 55%, respectively).
Our survey provides an understanding of the amount of time that emergency physicians in GEM spend abroad and the types of activities in which they are currently engaged, as well as the barriers that need to be overcome in order to achieve fulfilling careers in this field.
越来越多的急诊医学住院医师和研究员正在完成额外培训,以期从事全球急诊医学(GEM)领域的工作。与此同时,许多学术性急诊科正在投入资源发展全球急诊医学部门和全球/国际急诊医学研究员项目。然而,这一亚专业成功职业发展的路径仍未明确。
我们的目的是对从事全球急诊医学的急诊医生进行调查,以描述他们的执业模式和职业路径,并确定成功职业发展的障碍。
向急诊医生开展了一项在线调查,评估人口统计学特征、工作时间和内容、资金和障碍以及学术产出。使用STATA软件分析描述性统计数据。
共有116名急诊主治医生做出回应。女性受访者往往更年轻(51%对27%;p = 0.012)。年轻受访者更有可能完成高级全球急诊医学培训(20%对7%;p = 0.037)。大多数(73%)受访者每年在国外的时间少于3个月。自筹资金是最常见的(47%)资金来源,而只有16%的人报告获得了资助支持。缺乏时间和资金是全球急诊医学职业发展最常遇到的障碍(分别为64%和55%)。
我们的调查让我们了解了从事全球急诊医学的急诊医生在国外花费的时间、他们目前从事的活动类型,以及在该领域实现充实职业发展需要克服的障碍。