Suppr超能文献

一项关于正念测量与疼痛灾难化之间关联的调查。

An investigation of the associations between measures of mindfulness and pain catastrophizing.

作者信息

Day Melissa A, Smitherman Anna, Ward L Charles, Thorn Beverly E

机构信息

*Department of Psychology, University of Alabama †Psychology Service, V.A. Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, AL.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2015 Mar;31(3):222-8. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000102.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Mindfulness and pain catastrophizing are important constructs in pain research, and there are theoretical reasons for suspecting that measures of the 2 constructs should be related in predictable ways. The present study investigated the association of pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale) with mindfulness (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire). The Penn State Worry Questionnaire was included to control for confounding of worry; the influence of demographics was explored.

METHODS

The participants were 214 undergraduates, who were administered questionnaires via the Internet. Analyses assessed relationships after correcting for attenuation.

RESULTS

The mindfulness scales had intercorrelations with catastrophizing ranging from -0.23 to 0.13; the Non-Judging, Non-Reactivity, and Acting with Awareness mindfulness scales correlated significantly with catastrophizing. However, worry was better correlated (r=0.35) with catastrophizing, and the mindfulness scales were not significantly related to catastrophizing after controlling for worry. Mindfulness scales were significant predictors (P=0.018) of catastrophizing scores in a single-indicator latent variable analysis, and 1 mindfulness scale (Non-Reactivity) contributed uniquely (P=0.006) to prediction. None of the mindfulness scales significantly predicted catastrophizing scores when worry was controlled, but the path from worry to catastrophizing was significant (P=0.048). Sex differences in catastrophizing scores were explained by sex differences on the worry scale (P<0.001).

DISCUSSION

These findings suggest that it is important to assess more general cognitive-emotional constructs, such as worry, when making inferences about the influence of mindfulness or changes in mindfulness upon catastrophic thinking in response to pain.

摘要

目的

正念和疼痛灾难化是疼痛研究中的重要概念,并且有理论依据怀疑这两个概念的测量指标应以可预测的方式相关联。本研究调查了疼痛灾难化(疼痛灾难化量表)与正念(五因素正念问卷)之间的关联。纳入了宾夕法尼亚州立大学忧虑问卷以控制忧虑的混杂因素;探讨了人口统计学因素的影响。

方法

参与者为214名本科生,通过互联网对他们进行问卷调查。分析在校正衰减后评估关系。

结果

正念量表与灾难化的相互关联范围为-0.23至0.13;非评判、非反应性和有意识行动正念量表与灾难化显著相关。然而,忧虑与灾难化的相关性更好(r = 0.35),并且在控制忧虑后,正念量表与灾难化无显著关联。在单指标潜在变量分析中,正念量表是灾难化得分的显著预测因子(P = 0.018),且一个正念量表(非反应性)对预测有独特贡献(P = 0.006)。在控制忧虑时,没有一个正念量表能显著预测灾难化得分,但从忧虑到灾难化的路径是显著的(P = 0.048)。忧虑量表上的性别差异解释了灾难化得分的性别差异(P < 0.001)。

讨论

这些发现表明,在推断正念或正念变化对疼痛相关灾难化思维的影响时,评估更一般的认知 - 情感概念(如忧虑)很重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验