College of Public Health, The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA; The Hamner-University of North Carolina Institute for Drug Safety Sciences, The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
The Hamner-University of North Carolina Institute for Drug Safety Sciences, The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2014 Jun 1;277(2):131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2014.03.015. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
NP260 was designed as a first-in-class selective antagonist of α4-subtype GABAA receptors that had promising efficacy in animal models of pain, epilepsy, psychosis, and anxiety. However, development of NP260 was complicated following a 28-day safety study in dogs in which pronounced elevations of serum aminotransferase levels were observed, although there was no accompanying histopathological indication of hepatocellular injury. To further investigate the liver effects of NP260, we assayed stored serum samples from the 28-day dog study for liver specific miRNA (miR-122) as well as enzymatic biomarkers glutamate dehydrogenase and sorbitol dehydrogenase, which indicate liver necrosis. Cytotoxicity assessments were conducted in hepatocytes derived from dog, rat, and human liver samples to address the species specificity of the liver response to NP260. All biomarkers, except ALT, returned toward baseline by Day 29 despite continued drug treatment, suggesting adaptation to the initial injury. In vitro analysis of the toxicity potential of NP260 to primary hepatocytes indicated a relative sensitivity of dog>human>rat, which may explain, in part, why the liver effects were not evident in the rodent safety studies. Taken together, the data indicate that a diagnostic biomarker approach, coupled with sensitive in vitro screening strategies, may facilitate interpretation of toxicity potential when an adaptive event masks the underlying toxicity.
NP260 被设计为一种新型的α4 亚型 GABA A 受体选择性拮抗剂,在疼痛、癫痫、精神病和焦虑的动物模型中显示出有前景的疗效。然而,在一项为期 28 天的犬安全性研究中,NP260 的开发变得复杂,尽管没有肝实质损伤的组织病理学迹象,但观察到血清转氨酶水平明显升高。为了进一步研究 NP260 的肝脏作用,我们检测了 28 天犬研究中储存的血清样本中的肝脏特异性 microRNA(miR-122)以及谷氨酸脱氢酶和山梨醇脱氢酶等酶生物标志物,这些标志物表明存在肝坏死。在源自犬、大鼠和人肝样本的肝细胞中进行了细胞毒性评估,以解决 NP260 对肝脏反应的种属特异性问题。除了 ALT 之外,所有生物标志物在第 29 天都恢复到基线水平,尽管仍在继续用药,这表明对初始损伤的适应。NP260 对原代肝细胞毒性潜力的体外分析表明,犬的敏感性相对较高>人>大鼠,这可能部分解释了为什么在啮齿动物安全性研究中没有发现肝脏效应。综上所述,数据表明,诊断生物标志物方法与敏感的体外筛选策略相结合,可能有助于在适应性事件掩盖潜在毒性时解释毒性潜力。