Mourão Márcio, Satin Leslie, Schnell Santiago
Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America; Brehm Center for Diabetes Research, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 3;9(4):e93826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093826. eCollection 2014.
We investigated commonly used methods (Autocorrelation, Enright, and Discrete Fourier Transform) to estimate the periodicity of oscillatory data and determine which method most accurately estimated periods while being least vulnerable to the presence of noise. Both simulated and experimental data were used in the analysis performed. We determined the significance of calculated periods by applying these methods to several random permutations of the data and then calculating the probability of obtaining the period's peak in the corresponding periodograms. Our analysis suggests that the Enright method is the most accurate for estimating the period of oscillatory data. We further show that to accurately estimate the period of oscillatory data, it is necessary that at least five cycles of data are sampled, using at least four data points per cycle. These results suggest that the Enright method should be more widely applied in order to improve the analysis of oscillatory data.
我们研究了常用方法(自相关法、恩赖特法和离散傅里叶变换法)来估计振荡数据的周期性,并确定哪种方法在最不易受噪声影响的情况下能最准确地估计周期。在进行的分析中使用了模拟数据和实验数据。我们通过将这些方法应用于数据的几种随机排列,然后计算在相应周期图中获得周期峰值的概率,来确定计算出的周期的显著性。我们的分析表明,恩赖特法在估计振荡数据的周期方面最为准确。我们进一步表明,为了准确估计振荡数据的周期,每个周期至少使用四个数据点对至少五个周期的数据进行采样是必要的。这些结果表明,应更广泛地应用恩赖特法以改进对振荡数据的分析。