Van Yperen Nico W, Blaga Monica, Postmes Tom
Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 3;9(4):e93594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093594. eCollection 2014.
During the past three decades, the achievement goal approach to achievement motivation has emerged as an influential area of research, and is dedicated to understanding the reasons behind the individual's drive to achieve competence and performance. However, the current literature on achievement goals is segmented rather than integrated. That is, citations across the three major and distinct achievement domains (work, education, and sports) are more the exception than the rule and similarities and differences between findings for the different achievement domains have yet to be tested. The purpose of the present study was to examine the relationships between self-reported achievement goals and nonself-report performance through meta-analysis, and the moderating potential of achievement domain. Identifying achievement domain as moderator improves our understanding to which contexts we can (not) generalize conclusions to, it helps to understand seemingly inconsistent findings, and opens avenues for future research on the underlying processes. Because the achievement goal (AG) measure used in a study is partially confounded with achievement domain, we examined the moderating role of this variable as well. Our findings suggest that - overall - approach goals (either mastery or performance) were associated positively with performance attainment, whereas avoidance goals (either mastery or performance) were associated negatively with performance attainment. These relationships were moderated by achievement domain. For example, relative to the education or work domain, in the sports domain, we did not observe negative correlations between avoidance goals and performance. The absence of statistical moderation due to AG measure suggests that the observed moderation of achievement domain cannot be explained by the AG measure utilized. We suggest further steps to integrate the achievement goal literature, and accordingly, to broaden and deepen understanding of performance attainment in competence-relevant settings, including the workplace, the sports field, and the classroom.
在过去三十年中,成就动机的成就目标取向已成为一个有影响力的研究领域,致力于理解个体追求能力和表现背后的原因。然而,当前关于成就目标的文献是分散的而非整合的。也就是说,在三个主要且不同的成就领域(工作、教育和体育)中的引用更多是例外而非常规,不同成就领域研究结果之间的异同尚未得到检验。本研究的目的是通过元分析来检验自我报告的成就目标与非自我报告表现之间的关系,以及成就领域的调节潜力。将成就领域确定为调节变量能增进我们对可(不可)将结论推广到哪些情境的理解,有助于理解看似不一致的研究结果,并为未来关于潜在过程的研究开辟道路。由于研究中使用的成就目标(AG)测量与成就领域部分混淆,我们也检验了该变量的调节作用。我们的研究结果表明,总体而言,趋近目标(无论是掌握目标还是成绩目标)与表现达成呈正相关,而回避目标(无论是掌握目标还是成绩目标)与表现达成呈负相关。这些关系受到成就领域的调节。例如,相对于教育或工作领域,在体育领域,我们未观察到回避目标与表现之间的负相关。由于AG测量未出现统计上的调节作用,这表明观察到的成就领域调节作用无法用所使用的AG测量来解释。我们建议采取进一步措施整合成就目标文献,从而拓宽和加深对在与能力相关情境(包括职场、运动场和课堂)中表现达成的理解。