Kaundun Shiv S
Syngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Biological Sciences, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK.
Pest Manag Sci. 2014 Sep;70(9):1405-17. doi: 10.1002/ps.3790. Epub 2014 May 6.
Resistance to acetyl-CoA carboxylase herbicides is documented in at least 43 grass weeds and is particularly problematic in Lolium, Alopecurus and Avena species. Genetic studies have shown that resistance generally evolves independently and can be conferred by target-site mutations at ACCase codon positions 1781, 1999, 2027, 2041, 2078, 2088 and 2096. The level of resistance depends on the herbicides, recommended field rates, weed species, plant growth stages, specific amino acid changes and the number of gene copies and mutant ACCase alleles. Non-target-site resistance, or in essence metabolic resistance, is prevalent, multigenic and favoured under low-dose selection. Metabolic resistance can be specific but also broad, affecting other modes of action. Some target-site and metabolic-resistant biotypes are characterised by a fitness penalty. However, the significance for resistance regression in the absence of ACCase herbicides is yet to be determined over a practical timeframe. More recently, a fitness benefit has been reported in some populations containing the I1781L mutation in terms of vegetative and reproductive outputs and delayed germination. Several DNA-based methods have been developed to detect known ACCase resistance mutations, unlike metabolic resistance, as the genes remain elusive to date. Therefore, confirmation of resistance is still carried out via whole-plant herbicide bioassays. A growing number of monocotyledonous crops have been engineered to resist ACCase herbicides, thus increasing the options for grass weed control. While the science of ACCase herbicide resistance has progressed significantly over the past 10 years, several avenues provided in the present review remain to be explored for a better understanding of resistance to this important mode of action.
至少43种禾本科杂草已被证明对乙酰辅酶A羧化酶除草剂具有抗性,在黑麦草、看麦娘和燕麦属物种中尤其成问题。遗传学研究表明,抗性通常是独立进化的,可由乙酰辅酶A羧化酶密码子位置1781、1999、2027、2041、2078、2088和2096处的靶标位点突变引起。抗性水平取决于除草剂、推荐的田间用量、杂草种类、植物生长阶段、特定氨基酸变化以及基因拷贝数和突变型乙酰辅酶A羧化酶等位基因数量。非靶标位点抗性,或者本质上的代谢抗性很普遍,是多基因的,并且在低剂量选择下更易出现。代谢抗性可以是特异性的,但也具有广谱性,会影响其他作用方式。一些靶标位点和代谢抗性生物型具有适合度代价。然而,在实际时间范围内,在没有乙酰辅酶A羧化酶除草剂的情况下,抗性消退的意义尚待确定。最近,在一些含有I1781L突变的种群中,已报道了在营养和生殖产出以及延迟发芽方面的适合度优势。已经开发了几种基于DNA的方法来检测已知的乙酰辅酶A羧化酶抗性突变,与代谢抗性不同,因为这些基因至今仍难以捉摸。因此,抗性的确认仍然通过整株植物除草剂生物测定来进行。越来越多的单子叶作物已被设计成能抵抗乙酰辅酶A羧化酶除草剂,从而增加了禾本科杂草防治的选择。虽然在过去10年中,乙酰辅酶A羧化酶除草剂抗性科学取得了显著进展,但本综述中提出的几个途径仍有待探索,以便更好地理解对这种重要作用方式的抗性。