Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Faculty of Medicine, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, HongKong, SAR, China.
Int J Surg. 2014;12(5):437-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.03.009. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
Partial hepatectomy with clear surgical margins is the main curative treatment for hepatic malignancies. The safety of liver resection, to a great extent, depends on the volume of future liver remnant. This manuscript reviews some important strategies that have been developed to increase resectability for patients with borderline volume of future liver remnant, particularly associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS).
To identify potentially relevant articles, we searched Medline and PubMed from January 2010 to December 2013 using the keywords "Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy", "ALPPS", "portal vein embolization", "future liver remnant", "liver hypertrophy", and "liver failure". A number of references from the key articles were also cited. There were no exclusion criteria for published information to the topics.
Portal vein ligation (PVL) or embolization (PVE) are traditional approaches to induce liver hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR) prior to hepatectomy in primarily non-resectable liver tumors. However, about 14 percent of patients fail to this approach. Adequate hypertrophy of the FLR using PVL or PVE generally takes more than four weeks. ALPPS can induce rapid growth of the FLR, which is more effective than by portal vein embolization or occlusion alone. Reportedly, the hypertrophy extent of FLR was 40%-80% within 6-9 days in contrast to approximately 8%-27% within 2-60 days by PVL/PVE. However, ALPPS was reported to have high operative morbidity (16%-64% of patients), mortality (12%-23% of patients) and bile leakage rates. Bile leakage and sepsis remain a major cause of morbidity, and the main cause of mortality includes hepatic insufficiency.
ALPPS has emerged as a new strategy to increase resectability of hepatic malignancies. Due to high morbidity and mortality rates of ALPPS procedure, the surgical candidates should be selected carefully. Moreover, there are very limited available evidence for its technical feasibility, safety and oncological outcome which are needed for further evaluation in larger scale of studies.
肝切除术联合明确的手术切缘是治疗肝脏恶性肿瘤的主要手段。肝切除术的安全性在很大程度上取决于剩余肝脏的体积。本文综述了一些旨在增加肝切除边缘安全的重要策略,尤其是针对肝脏边缘体积不足的患者,包括联合肝脏分隔和门静脉结扎的两阶段肝切除术(ALPPS)。
为了识别潜在的相关文章,我们使用关键词“联合肝脏分隔和门静脉结扎的两阶段肝切除术”、“ALPPS”、“门静脉栓塞”、“剩余肝脏”、“肝脏增生”和“肝衰竭”,于 2010 年 1 月至 2013 年 12 月在 Medline 和 PubMed 中进行了检索。还引用了一些关键文章的参考文献。对于与主题相关的已发表信息,没有排除标准。
门静脉结扎(PVL)或栓塞(PVE)是在原发性不可切除的肝脏肿瘤患者行肝切除术前诱导剩余肝脏(FLR)增生的传统方法。然而,约 14%的患者对此方法无效。PVL 或 PVE 通常需要超过四周才能使 FLR 得到充分增生。ALPPS 可以诱导 FLR 的快速生长,其效果优于单独门静脉栓塞或闭塞。据报道,与 PVL/PVE 引起的 FLR 增生约 8%-27%相比,ALPPS 可使 FLR 在 6-9 天内增生 40%-80%。然而,据报道,ALPPS 手术的发病率(16%-64%的患者)和死亡率(12%-23%的患者)以及胆漏率较高。胆漏和感染仍然是发病率高的主要原因,而死亡率的主要原因包括肝功能不全。
ALPPS 已成为增加肝脏恶性肿瘤可切除性的新策略。由于 ALPPS 手术的高发病率和死亡率,应仔细选择手术候选人。此外,其技术可行性、安全性和肿瘤学结果的证据非常有限,需要进一步在更大规模的研究中进行评估。