Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌放疗所致继发性癌症风险:三维适形放疗与调强放疗及容积旋转调强放疗的比较

Radiotherapy-induced secondary cancer risk for breast cancer: 3D conformal therapy versus IMRT versus VMAT.

作者信息

Lee Boram, Lee Sunyoung, Sung Jiwon, Yoon Myonggeun

机构信息

Department of Bio-Convergence Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Korea. Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Medical Center, Daejeon, Korea.

出版信息

J Radiol Prot. 2014 Jun;34(2):325-31. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/34/2/325. Epub 2014 Apr 4.

Abstract

This study evaluated the secondary cancer risk to various organs due to radiation treatment for breast cancer. Organ doses to an anthropomorphic phantom were measured using a photoluminescent dosimeter (PLD) for breast cancer treatment with 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Cancer risk based on the measured dose was calculated using the BEIR (Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation) VII models. The secondary dose per treatment dose (50.4 Gy) to various organs ranged from 0.02 to 0.36 Gy for 3D-CRT, but from 0.07 to 8.48 Gy for IMRT and VMAT, indicating that the latter methods are associated with higher secondary radiation doses than 3D-CRT. The result of the homogeneity index in the breast target shows that the dose homogeneity of 3D-CRT was worse than those of IMRT and VMAT. The organ specific lifetime attributable risks (LARs) to the thyroid, contralateral breast and ipsilateral lung per 100 000 population were 0.02, 19.71, and 0.76 respectively for 3D-CRT, much lower than the 0.11, 463.56, and 10.59 respectively for IMRT and the 0.12, 290.32, and 12.28 respectively for VMAT. The overall estimation of LAR indicated that the radiation-induced cancer risk due to breast radiation therapy was lower with 3D-CRT than with IMRT or VMAT.

摘要

本研究评估了乳腺癌放射治疗对各个器官造成的继发癌症风险。使用光致发光剂量计(PLD)测量了拟人化体模中各器官的剂量,该体模用于接受三维适形放射治疗(3D-CRT)、调强放射治疗(IMRT)和容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)的乳腺癌治疗。基于测量剂量的癌症风险使用BEIR(电离辐射的生物学效应)VII模型进行计算。对于3D-CRT,每次治疗剂量(50.4 Gy)对各器官的继发剂量范围为0.02至0.36 Gy,但对于IMRT和VMAT则为0.07至8.48 Gy,这表明后两种方法与比3D-CRT更高的继发辐射剂量相关。乳腺靶区的均匀性指数结果显示,3D-CRT的剂量均匀性比IMRT和VMAT的要差。对于3D-CRT,每10万人口中甲状腺、对侧乳腺和同侧肺的器官特异性终生归因风险(LARs)分别为0.02、19.71和0.76,远低于IMRT分别对应的0.11、463.56和10.59,以及VMAT分别对应的0.12、290.32和12.28。LAR的总体估计表明,3D-CRT导致的乳腺癌放射治疗引起的辐射诱发癌症风险低于IMRT或VMAT。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验