Suppr超能文献

弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤在现代治疗时代的死亡率存在社会经济差异。

Socioeconomic disparities in mortality after diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the modern treatment era.

机构信息

Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA;

Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL; and.

出版信息

Blood. 2014 Jun 5;123(23):3553-62. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-07-517110. Epub 2014 Apr 4.

Abstract

Despite advances in treatment, including the introduction of rituximab, survival after diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains heterogeneous. However, no studies have considered the association between neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and race/ethnicity on DLBCL mortality before (1988-2000) and after (2001-2009) the introduction of rituximab. We studied all 33,032 DLBCL patients diagnosed between 1988-2009 in California for vital status through December 31, 2010. Patients diagnosed from 2001 to 2009 vs 1988 to 2000 had significantly decreased overall and DLBCL-specific mortality. However, those living in lower SES neighborhoods had 34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27%-40%) and 24% (95% CI, 16%-32%) higher mortality rate from all causes and lymphoma, respectively, than patients in higher SES neighborhoods. The magnitude of mortality disparities by neighborhood SES was more marked in younger (<65 years) than in older patients (≥65 years), in married than nonmarried patients, and after 2000. We concluded that patients living in low SES neighborhoods had substantially worse survival after DLBCL, and this disparity was striking in younger (ie, not eligible for Medicare-aged) patients, married patients, and after the introduction of rituximab. These disparities suggest there are barriers, including inadequate insurance coverage with additional financial burden, to effective treatment among socioeconomically disadvantaged patients.

摘要

尽管在治疗方面取得了进展,包括利妥昔单抗的引入,但弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的生存仍然存在异质性。然而,在利妥昔单抗引入之前(1988-2000 年)和之后(2001-2009 年),尚无研究考虑邻里社会经济地位(SES)和种族/族裔与 DLBCL 死亡率之间的关联。我们研究了 1988 年至 2009 年间在加利福尼亚州诊断出的所有 33032 例 DLBCL 患者的生存状态,截止日期为 2010 年 12 月 31 日。与 1988 年至 2000 年相比,2001 年至 2009 年诊断出的患者总体死亡率和 DLBCL 特异性死亡率明显下降。然而,居住在社会经济地位较低的社区的患者的全因死亡率和淋巴瘤死亡率分别高出 34%(95%置信区间,27%-40%)和 24%(95%置信区间,16%-32%)。邻里 SES 导致的死亡率差异在年龄较小(<65 岁)的患者中比年龄较大(≥65 岁)的患者更为显著,在已婚患者中比未婚患者更为显著,并且在 2000 年后更为显著。我们得出结论,居住在社会经济地位较低的社区的 DLBCL 患者的生存状况明显较差,这种差异在年龄较小(即不符合医疗保险年龄)的患者、已婚患者和利妥昔单抗引入后尤为明显。这些差异表明,社会经济地位不利的患者在接受有效治疗方面存在障碍,包括保险覆盖不足和额外的经济负担。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Marital status and survival in patients with cancer.婚姻状况与癌症患者的生存。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 1;31(31):3869-76. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.6489. Epub 2013 Sep 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验