From the Departments of Radiology (C.R.J., P.V., M.L.S., J.L.G., V.L., B.E.G.), Health Sciences Research (H.J.W., M.M.M., S.D.W., V.S.P.), and Neurology (D.S.K., R.C.P.), Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN.
Neurology. 2014 May 6;82(18):1605-12. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000386. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
To test the hypotheses predicted in a hypothetical model of Alzheimer disease (AD) biomarkers that rates of β-amyloid (Aβ) accumulation on PET imaging are not related to hippocampal neurodegeneration whereas rates of neurodegenerative brain atrophy depend on the presence of both amyloid and neurodegeneration in a population-based sample.
A total of 252 cognitively normal (CN) participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging had 2 or more serial visits with both amyloid PET and MRI. Subjects were classified into 4 groups based on baseline positive/negative amyloid PET (A+ or A-) and baseline hippocampal volume (N+ or N-). We compared rates of amyloid accumulation and rates of brain atrophy among the 4 groups.
At baseline, 148 (59%) were amyloid negative and neurodegeneration negative (A-N-), 29 (12%) amyloid negative and neurodegeneration positive (A-N+), 56 (22%) amyloid positive and neurodegeneration negative (A+N-), and 19 (8%) amyloid positive and neurodegeneration positive (A+N+). High rates of Aβ accumulation were found in those with abnormal amyloid at baseline and were not influenced by hippocampal neurodegeneration at baseline. In contrast, rates of brain atrophy were greatest in A+N+.
We describe a 2-feature biomarker approach to classifying elderly CN subjects that is complementary to the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association preclinical staging criteria. Our results support 2 key concepts in a model of the temporal evolution of AD biomarkers. First, the rate of Aβ accumulation is not influenced by neurodegeneration and thus may be a biologically independent process. Second, Aβ pathophysiology increases or catalyzes neurodegeneration.
检验阿尔茨海默病(AD)生物标志物假设模型中预测的假说,即在基于人群的样本中,淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)在 PET 成像上的积累速度与海马神经退行性变无关,而神经退行性脑萎缩的速度取决于淀粉样蛋白和神经退行性变的存在。
共有 252 名认知正常(CN)的 Mayo 诊所衰老研究参与者进行了 2 次或更多次淀粉样蛋白 PET 和 MRI 连续随访。根据基线时阳性/阴性淀粉样蛋白 PET(A+或 A-)和基线时海马体积(N+或 N-),将受试者分为 4 组。我们比较了 4 组之间的淀粉样蛋白积累率和脑萎缩率。
在基线时,148 名(59%)为淀粉样蛋白阴性和神经退行性变阴性(A-N-),29 名(12%)为淀粉样蛋白阴性和神经退行性变阳性(A-N+),56 名(22%)为淀粉样蛋白阳性和神经退行性变阴性(A+N-),19 名(8%)为淀粉样蛋白阳性和神经退行性变阳性(A+N+)。在基线时存在异常淀粉样蛋白的患者中发现了高淀粉样蛋白积累率,且不受基线时海马神经退行性变的影响。相比之下,A+N+患者的脑萎缩率最大。
我们描述了一种将老年 CN 受试者分类的 2 特征生物标志物方法,该方法与美国国家老龄化研究所-阿尔茨海默病协会的临床前分期标准互补。我们的结果支持 AD 生物标志物时间演变模型中的 2 个关键概念。首先,Aβ的积累速度不受神经退行性变的影响,因此可能是一个生物学上独立的过程。其次,Aβ病理生理学增加或促进神经退行性变。