Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 50-60, Room Ee 16.55, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The
Eur Cell Mater. 2014 Apr 6;27:264-80; discussion 278-80. doi: 10.22203/ecm.v027a19.
Cartilage has limited self-regenerative capacity. Tissue engineering can offer promising solutions for reconstruction of missing or damaged cartilage. A major challenge herein is to define an appropriate cell source that is capable of generating a stable and functional matrix. This study evaluated the performance of culture-expanded human chondrocytes from ear (EC), nose (NC) and articular joint (AC), as well as bone-marrow-derived and adipose-tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells both in vitro and in vivo. All cells (≥ 3 donors per source) were culture-expanded, encapsulated in alginate and cultured for 5 weeks. Subsequently, constructs were implanted subcutaneously for 8 additional weeks. Before and after implantation, glycosaminoglycan (GAG) and collagen content were measured using biochemical assays. Mechanical properties were determined using stress-strain-indentation tests. Hypertrophic differentiation was evaluated with qRT-PCR and subsequent endochondral ossification with histology. ACs had higher chondrogenic potential in vitro than the other cell sources, as assessed by gene expression and GAG content (p < 0.001). However, after implantation, ACs did not further increase their matrix. In contrast, ECs and NCs continued producing matrix in vivo leading to higher GAG content (p < 0.001) and elastic modulus. For NC-constructs, matrix-deposition was associated with the elastic modulus (R² = 0.477, p = 0.039). Although all cells--except ACs--expressed markers for hypertrophic differentiation in vitro, there was no bone formed in vivo. Our work shows that cartilage formation and functionality depends on the cell source used. ACs possess the highest chondrogenic capacity in vitro, while ECs and NCs are most potent in vivo, making them attractive cell sources for cartilage repair.
软骨的自我再生能力有限。组织工程为重建缺失或受损的软骨提供了有前景的解决方案。在此,一个主要的挑战是定义一种合适的细胞来源,使其能够产生稳定和功能性的基质。本研究评估了来自耳(EC)、鼻(NC)和关节(AC)的培养扩增的人软骨细胞,以及骨髓源性和脂肪组织源性间充质干细胞在体外和体内的性能。所有细胞(每个来源至少 3 个供体)均进行培养扩增,包被在藻酸盐中,并培养 5 周。随后,将构建体植入皮下 8 周。植入前后,通过生化分析测量糖胺聚糖(GAG)和胶原含量。使用应力-应变-压痕试验测定力学性能。通过 qRT-PCR 评估肥大分化,随后通过组织学评估软骨内骨化。AC 的体外软骨形成潜力高于其他细胞来源,表现在基因表达和 GAG 含量上(p < 0.001)。然而,植入后,AC 并没有进一步增加其基质。相比之下,EC 和 NC 继续在体内产生基质,导致 GAG 含量更高(p < 0.001)和弹性模量更高。对于 NC 构建体,基质沉积与弹性模量相关(R² = 0.477,p = 0.039)。尽管所有细胞(除了 AC 之外)在体外都表达了肥大分化的标志物,但在体内没有形成骨。我们的工作表明,软骨形成和功能取决于所使用的细胞来源。AC 具有最高的体外软骨形成能力,而 EC 和 NC 在体内最有效,使它们成为软骨修复的有吸引力的细胞来源。