Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Jan-Feb;8(1):21-30. doi: 10.1002/ase.1452. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
Ultrasound simulation allows students to virtually explore internal anatomy by producing accurate, moving, color, three-dimensional rendered slices from any angle or approach leaving the organs and their relationships intact without requirement for consumables. The aim was to determine the feasibility and efficacy of self-directed learning of cardiac anatomy with an ultrasound simulator compared to cadavers and plastic models. After a single cardiac anatomy lecture, fifty university anatomy students participated in a three-hour supervised self-directed learning exposure in groups of five, randomized to an ultrasound simulator or human cadaveric specimens and plastic models. Pre- and post-tests were conducted using pictorial and non-pictorial multiple-choice questions (MCQs). Simulator students completed a survey on their experience. Four simulator and seven cadaver group students did not attend after randomization. Simulator use in groups of five students was feasible and feedback from participants was very positive. Baseline test scores were similar (P = 0.9) between groups. After the learning intervention, there was no difference between groups in change in total test score (P = 0.37), whether they were pictorial (P = 0.6) or non-pictorial (P = 0.21). In both groups there was an increase in total test scores (simulator +19.8 ±12.4%% and cadaver: +16.4% ± 10.2, P < 0.0001), pictorial question scores (+22.9 ±18.0%, 19.7 ±19.3%, P < 0.001) and non-pictorial question scores (+16.7 ±18.2%, +13 ±15.4%, P = 0.002). The ultrasound simulator appears equivalent to human cadaveric prosections for learning cardiac anatomy.
超声模拟允许学生通过从任何角度或方法产生准确、移动、彩色、三维渲染切片来虚拟探索内部解剖结构,而不会破坏器官及其关系,也无需消耗品。目的是确定与尸体和塑料模型相比,使用超声模拟器进行自主学习心脏解剖的可行性和效果。在一次心脏解剖学讲座后,五十名大学解剖学学生参加了三个小时的小组监督自主学习,每组五人,随机分为超声模拟器或人体尸体标本和塑料模型组。使用图片和非图片多选题(MCQ)进行预测试和后测试。模拟器学生完成了关于他们经验的调查。四名模拟器和七名尸体组学生在随机分组后没有出席。五名学生一组使用模拟器是可行的,参与者的反馈非常积极。基线测试成绩在两组之间相似(P=0.9)。在学习干预后,两组之间总测试成绩的变化没有差异(P=0.37),无论是图片(P=0.6)还是非图片(P=0.21)。在两组中,总测试成绩都有所增加(模拟器+19.8±12.4%和尸体:+16.4%±10.2%,P<0.0001),图片问题分数(+22.9±18.0%,19.7±19.3%,P<0.001)和非图片问题分数(+16.7±18.2%,+13±15.4%,P=0.002)。超声模拟器似乎与人体尸体标本一样适用于学习心脏解剖学。