• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗性血浆置换作为严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的挽救治疗:23例患者的回顾性观察单中心研究

Therapeutic plasma exchange as rescue therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: retrospective observational single-centre study of 23 patients.

作者信息

Hadem Johannes, Hafer Carsten, Schneider Andrea S, Wiesner Olaf, Beutel Gernot, Fuehner Thomas, Welte Tobias, Hoeper Marius M, Kielstein Jan T

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Apr 7;14:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-24.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2253-14-24
PMID:24708653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3986467/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several case series and small randomized controlled trials suggest that therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) improves coagulation, hemodynamics and possibly survival in severe sepsis. However, the exact role of TPE in modern sepsis therapy remains unclear.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational single-centre study on the use of TPE as rescue therapy in 23 consecutive patients with severe sepsis or septic shock from 2005 to 2012. Main surrogate markers of multiple organ failure (MOF) before, during and after TPE as well as survival rates are reported.

RESULTS

At baseline, mean SOFA score was 13 (standard deviation [SD] 4) and median number of failed organ-systems was 5 (interquartile range [IQR] 4-5). TPEs were performed 3 days (IQR 2-10) after symptom onset and 1 day (IQR 0-8) after ICU admission. The median total exchange volume was 3750 ml (IQR 2500-6000), which corresponded to a mean of 1.5 times (SD 0.9) the individual plasma volume. Fresh frozen plasma was used in all but one treatments as replacement fluid. Net fluid balance decreased significantly within 12 hrs following the first TPE procedure by a median of 720 mL (p = 0.002), irrespective of outcome. Reductions of norepinephrine dose and improvement in cardiac index were observed in individual survivors, but this was not significant for the overall cohort (p = 0.574). Platelet counts decreased irrespective of outcome between days 0 and 2 (p < 0.003), and increased thereafter in many survivors. There was a non-significant trend towards younger age and higher procalcitonin levels among survivors. Nine out of 23 TPE treated patients (39%) survived until ICU discharge (among them 3 patients with baseline SOFA scores of 15, 17, and 20).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that some patients with severe sepsis and septic shock may experience hemodynamic stabilisation by early TPE therapy.

摘要

背景

多项病例系列研究和小型随机对照试验表明,治疗性血浆置换(TPE)可改善严重脓毒症患者的凝血功能、血流动力学,可能还会提高生存率。然而,TPE在现代脓毒症治疗中的确切作用仍不明确。

方法

我们对2005年至2012年期间连续23例严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者使用TPE作为挽救治疗进行了一项单中心回顾性观察研究。报告了TPE治疗前、治疗期间和治疗后的多器官功能衰竭(MOF)主要替代指标以及生存率。

结果

基线时,平均序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分为13(标准差[SD]4),器官系统功能衰竭的中位数为5(四分位间距[IQR]4 - 5)。TPE在症状出现后3天(IQR 2 - 10)和入住重症监护病房(ICU)后1天(IQR 0 - 8)进行。血浆置换总量中位数为3750 ml(IQR 2500 - 6000),相当于个体血浆量均值的1.5倍(SD 0.9)。除1例治疗外,其余所有治疗均使用新鲜冰冻血浆作为置换液。无论治疗结果如何,首次TPE治疗后12小时内净液体平衡显著下降,中位数为720 mL(p = 0.002)。个别存活患者去甲肾上腺素剂量减少,心脏指数改善,但对整个队列而言无显著意义(p = 0.574)。无论治疗结果如何,血小板计数在第0天至第2天之间均下降(p < 0.003),此后许多存活患者血小板计数升高。存活患者有年龄较轻和降钙素原水平较高的非显著趋势。23例接受TPE治疗的患者中有9例(39%)存活至ICU出院(其中3例基线SOFA评分为15、17和20)。

结论

我们的数据表明,一些严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者可能通过早期TPE治疗实现血流动力学稳定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aff/3986467/fc6d24f75849/1471-2253-14-24-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aff/3986467/7f87676738c4/1471-2253-14-24-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aff/3986467/6c3e8772f8d7/1471-2253-14-24-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aff/3986467/fc6d24f75849/1471-2253-14-24-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aff/3986467/7f87676738c4/1471-2253-14-24-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aff/3986467/6c3e8772f8d7/1471-2253-14-24-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aff/3986467/fc6d24f75849/1471-2253-14-24-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Therapeutic plasma exchange as rescue therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: retrospective observational single-centre study of 23 patients.治疗性血浆置换作为严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的挽救治疗:23例患者的回顾性观察单中心研究
BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Apr 7;14:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-24.
2
Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Neonatal Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study.新生儿败血症性休克的治疗性血浆置换:一项回顾性队列研究。
Am J Perinatol. 2020 Jul;37(9):962-969. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1692184. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
3
The therapeutic efficacy of adjunct therapeutic plasma exchange for septic shock with multiple organ failure: a single-center experience.辅助治疗性血浆置换治疗脓毒性休克伴多器官衰竭的疗效:单中心经验。
Crit Care. 2020 Aug 24;24(1):518. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03241-6.
4
Efficacy of 4-hour rescue therapeutic plasma exchange in severe septic shock patients.4 小时挽救性治疗性血浆置换在严重脓毒性休克患者中的疗效。
Rom J Intern Med. 2020 Jun 1;58(2):75-80. doi: 10.2478/rjim-2019-0026.
5
EXCHANGE-2: investigating the efficacy of add-on plasma exchange as an adjunctive strategy against septic shock-a study protocol for a randomized, prospective, multicenter, open-label, controlled, parallel-group trial.EXCHANGE-2 研究:评估附加血浆置换作为脓毒性休克辅助治疗策略的疗效—一项针对随机、前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、对照、平行分组试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Apr 15;24(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07300-5.
6
Early therapeutic plasma exchange in septic shock: a prospective open-label nonrandomized pilot study focusing on safety, hemodynamics, vascular barrier function, and biologic markers.早期治疗性血浆置换在感染性休克中的应用:一项关注安全性、血液动力学、血管屏障功能和生物标志物的前瞻性开放标签非随机初步研究。
Crit Care. 2018 Oct 30;22(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2220-9.
7
Evaluation of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy and Therapeutic Plasma Exchange, in Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock in Critically Ill Children.评价连续性肾脏替代治疗和治疗性血浆置换在危重症儿童严重脓毒症或感染性休克中的应用。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Jul 7;55(7):350. doi: 10.3390/medicina55070350.
8
Hemodynamic stability in liver failure patients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange.肝功能衰竭患者行治疗性血浆置换的血流动力学稳定性。
J Clin Apher. 2020 Apr;35(2):86-93. doi: 10.1002/jca.21761. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
9
Survival Benefits of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.治疗性血浆置换治疗严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的生存获益:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jul;38(7):598-611. doi: 10.1177/08850666231170775. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
10
Clinical and biochemical endpoints and predictors of response to plasma exchange in septic shock: results from a randomized controlled trial.在感染性休克中,血浆置换治疗反应的临床和生化终点及预测因素:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Crit Care. 2022 May 12;26(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04003-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of therapeutic plasma exchange treatment on short-term mortality of critically ill adult patients with sepsis-induced organ dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.治疗性血浆置换治疗对脓毒症引起的器官功能障碍的危重症成年患者短期死亡率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2024 Jan 4;28(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04795-x.
2
Analysis of Risk Factors and Protective Strategies for Tube Blockage in Patients with Drug-Induced Liver Failure Based on Artificial Liver Therapy.基于人工肝治疗的药物性肝衰竭患者管路堵塞危险因素分析及防护策略
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2023 Apr 8;2023:8201776. doi: 10.1155/2023/8201776. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2012 年。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.
2
Fluid balance and urine volume are independent predictors of mortality in acute kidney injury.液体平衡和尿量是急性肾损伤患者死亡率的独立预测因素。
Crit Care. 2013 Jan 24;17(1):R14. doi: 10.1186/cc12484.
3
Angiopoietin-2 may contribute to multiple organ dysfunction and death in sepsis*.血管生成素-2 可能导致脓毒症*中的多器官功能障碍和死亡。
Paediatric sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE): a comprehensive review.
儿科脓毒症相关性脑病(SAE):全面综述。
Mol Med. 2023 Feb 23;29(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s10020-023-00621-w.
4
Effects of hydrogen-rich saline in neuroinflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction in rat model of sepsis-associated encephalopathy.富氢盐水对脓毒症相关性脑病大鼠模型神经炎症和线粒体功能障碍的影响。
J Transl Med. 2022 Nov 26;20(1):546. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03746-4.
5
Therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with sepsis: Secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.脓毒症患者的治疗性血浆置换:一项集群随机对照试验的二次分析。
J Clin Apher. 2023 Feb;38(1):55-62. doi: 10.1002/jca.22027. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
6
The comparison of the mortality rates of plasmapheresis/hemoperfusion therapy with current treatment among Covid-19 patients.新冠病毒肺炎(Covid-19)患者中血浆置换/血液灌流疗法与当前治疗的死亡率比较。
Heliyon. 2022 Nov;8(11):e11282. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11282. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
7
The Use of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in the Treatment of a Pregnant Woman with COVID-19 Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.治疗性血浆置换在治疗新冠肺炎诱发的急性呼吸窘迫综合征孕妇中的应用
Pulm Ther. 2022 Jun;8(2):233-240. doi: 10.1007/s41030-022-00188-7. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
8
Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Single-center Experience.儿科重症监护病房中的治疗性血浆置换:单中心经验
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Oct;25(10):1189-1192. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23985.
9
Therapeutic Effects of Plasmapheresis on Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Hepatitis B Infection.血浆置换对慢性乙型肝炎感染急性加重期的治疗作用
Cureus. 2021 Jan 19;13(1):e12779. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12779.
10
Continuous Plasma Exchange With Dialysis for Severe Sepsis: Case Series of a Novel Blood Purification Method.连续性血浆置换联合透析治疗严重脓毒症:一种新型血液净化方法的病例系列研究
Cureus. 2021 Jan 5;13(1):e12495. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12495.
Crit Care Med. 2012 Nov;40(11):3034-41. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31825fdc31.
4
Septic shock with multiorgan failure: from conventional apheresis to adsorption therapies.伴有多器官功能衰竭的感染性休克:从传统血液分离疗法到吸附疗法
Semin Dial. 2012 Mar-Apr;25(2):171-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2011.01029.x. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
5
Complications of apheresis.单采术的并发症。
Semin Dial. 2012 Mar-Apr;25(2):152-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2011.01026.x. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
6
We should abandon randomized controlled trials in the intensive care unit.我们应该放弃重症监护病房中的随机对照试验。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Oct;38(10 Suppl):S534-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f208ac.
7
Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Case 25-2010. A 24-year-old woman with abdominal pain and shock.马萨诸塞州总医院病例记录。病例25 - 2010。一名24岁腹痛伴休克的女性。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):766-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcpc1003887.
8
Removal of elevated circulating angiopoietin-2 by plasma exchange--a pilot study in critically ill patients with thrombotic microangiopathy and anti-glomerular basement membrane disease.血浆置换清除升高的循环血管生成素-2:血栓性微血管病和抗肾小球基底膜病危重症患者的初步研究。
Thromb Haemost. 2010 Nov;104(5):1038-43. doi: 10.1160/TH10-02-0138. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
9
Prevention, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of sepsis: 1st revision of S-2k guidelines of the German Sepsis Society (Deutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft e.V. (DSG)) and the German Interdisciplinary Association of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI)).脓毒症的预防、诊断、治疗及随访:德国脓毒症协会(Deutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft e.V. (DSG))和德国重症监护与急诊医学跨学科协会(Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI))S-2k指南第1版修订本
Ger Med Sci. 2010 Jun 28;8:Doc14. doi: 10.3205/000103.
10
Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice--evidence-based approach from the Apheresis Applications Committee of the American Society for Apheresis.临床实践中治疗性血液成分单采的使用指南——来自美国血液成分单采协会血液成分单采应用委员会的循证方法
J Clin Apher. 2010;25(3):83-177. doi: 10.1002/jca.20240.