• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

EXCHANGE-2 研究:评估附加血浆置换作为脓毒性休克辅助治疗策略的疗效—一项针对随机、前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、对照、平行分组试验的研究方案。

EXCHANGE-2: investigating the efficacy of add-on plasma exchange as an adjunctive strategy against septic shock-a study protocol for a randomized, prospective, multicenter, open-label, controlled, parallel-group trial.

机构信息

Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Trials. 2023 Apr 15;24(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07300-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-023-07300-5
PMID:37061693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10105400/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to an infection. The mortality of sepsis and particular of septic shock is very high. Treatment mostly focuses on infection control but a specific intervention that targets the underlying pathological host response is lacking to the present time. The investigators hypothesize that early therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) will dampen the maladaptive host response by removing injurious mediators thereby limiting organ dysfunction and improving survival in patients with septic shock. Although small prospective studies demonstrated rapid hemodynamic stabilization under TPE, no adequately powered randomized clinical trial has investigated hard outcomes.

METHODS

This is a randomized, prospective, multicenter, open-label, controlled, parallel-group interventional trial to test the adjunctive effect of TPE in patients with early septic shock. Patients with a refractory (defined as norepinephrine (NE) ≥ 0.4 μg/kg/min ≥ 30 min OR NE 0.3 μg/kg/min + vasopressin) and early (shock onset < 24 h) septic shock will be included. The intervention is a standard TPE with donor fresh frozen plasma (1.2 × individual plasma volume) performed within 6 h after randomization and will be compared to a standard of care (SOC) control arm. The primary endpoint is 28 days mortality for which the power analysis revealed a group size of 137 / arm (n = 274) to demonstrate a benefit of 15%. The key secondary objective will be to compare the extent of organ failure indicated by mean SOFA over the first 7 days as well as organ support-free days until day 28 following randomization. Besides numerous biological secondary, safety endpoints such as incidence of bleeding, allergic reactions, transfusion associated lung injury, severe thrombocytopenia, and other severe adverse events will be assessed during the first 7 days. For exploratory scientific analyses, biomaterial will be acquired longitudinally and multiple predefined scientific subprojects are planned. This study is an investigator-initiated trial supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG, DA 1209/7-1), in which 26 different centers in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria will participate over a duration of 33 months.

DISCUSSION

This trial has substantial clinical relevance as it evaluates a promising adjunctive treatment option in refractory septic shock patients suffering from an extraordinary high mortality. A positive trial result could change the current standard of care for this septic subgroup. The results of this study will be disseminated through presentations at international congresses, workshops, and peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05726825 , Registered on 14 February 2023.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41a6/10105400/897ea26d9a15/13063_2023_7300_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41a6/10105400/897ea26d9a15/13063_2023_7300_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41a6/10105400/897ea26d9a15/13063_2023_7300_Fig1_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

败血症是一种危及生命的器官功能障碍,由宿主对感染的失调反应引起。败血症,尤其是败血症性休克的死亡率非常高。目前的治疗主要集中在感染控制上,但缺乏针对潜在病理宿主反应的特定干预措施。研究人员假设早期治疗性血浆置换(TPE)通过清除有害介质来抑制适应性宿主反应,从而限制器官功能障碍并提高败血症性休克患者的生存率。尽管小型前瞻性研究表明 TPE 可迅速稳定血流动力学,但尚无足够大的随机临床试验调查硬终点。

方法

这是一项随机、前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、对照、平行组干预试验,旨在测试 TPE 在早期败血症性休克患者中的辅助作用。将纳入难治性(定义为去甲肾上腺素(NE)≥0.4μg/kg/min≥30 分钟或 NE 0.3μg/kg/min+血管加压素)和早期(休克发作<24 小时)败血症性休克的患者。干预措施是在随机分组后 6 小时内进行标准 TPE 和供体新鲜冷冻血浆(1.2×个体血浆容量),并与标准治疗(SOC)对照组进行比较。主要终点是 28 天死亡率,通过功率分析显示每组需要 137 例/臂(n=274 例)才能证明 15%的获益。关键次要目标是比较前 7 天内 SOFA 平均器官衰竭程度以及随机分组后第 28 天前的器官支持无天数。除了许多生物学次要终点和安全性终点(如出血、过敏反应、输血相关肺损伤、严重血小板减少症和其他严重不良事件的发生率)外,还将在第 7 天内进行评估。为了进行探索性科学分析,将进行纵向采集生物材料,并计划进行多个预先定义的科学子项目。这项研究是由德国研究基金会(DFG,DA 1209/7-1)资助的一项由研究者发起的试验,德国、瑞士和奥地利的 26 个不同中心将参与该试验,持续 33 个月。

讨论

这项试验具有重要的临床意义,因为它评估了一种有前途的辅助治疗选择,适用于患有极高死亡率的难治性败血症性休克患者。阳性试验结果可能会改变这种败血症亚组的当前标准治疗方法。该研究的结果将通过在国际会议、研讨会和同行评议出版物上的演讲进行传播。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05726825,于 2023 年 2 月 14 日注册。

相似文献

1
EXCHANGE-2: investigating the efficacy of add-on plasma exchange as an adjunctive strategy against septic shock-a study protocol for a randomized, prospective, multicenter, open-label, controlled, parallel-group trial.EXCHANGE-2 研究:评估附加血浆置换作为脓毒性休克辅助治疗策略的疗效—一项针对随机、前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、对照、平行分组试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Apr 15;24(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07300-5.
2
Early therapeutic plasma exchange in septic shock: a prospective open-label nonrandomized pilot study focusing on safety, hemodynamics, vascular barrier function, and biologic markers.早期治疗性血浆置换在感染性休克中的应用:一项关注安全性、血液动力学、血管屏障功能和生物标志物的前瞻性开放标签非随机初步研究。
Crit Care. 2018 Oct 30;22(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2220-9.
3
Clinical and biochemical endpoints and predictors of response to plasma exchange in septic shock: results from a randomized controlled trial.在感染性休克中,血浆置换治疗反应的临床和生化终点及预测因素:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Crit Care. 2022 May 12;26(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04003-2.
4
A pilot study of therapeutic plasma exchange for serious SARS CoV-2 disease (COVID-19): A structured summary of a randomized controlled trial study protocol.严重严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型疾病(COVID-19)的治疗性血浆置换的初步研究:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jun 8;21(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04454-4.
5
The therapeutic efficacy of adjunct therapeutic plasma exchange for septic shock with multiple organ failure: a single-center experience.辅助治疗性血浆置换治疗脓毒性休克伴多器官衰竭的疗效:单中心经验。
Crit Care. 2020 Aug 24;24(1):518. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03241-6.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Randomized clinical trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma use among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (PERUCONPLASMA): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.随机临床试验评估 COVID-19 住院患者使用恢复期血浆的安全性和疗效(PERUCONPLASMA):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 May 17;22(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05189-6.
8
The scientific rationale and study protocol for the DPP3, Angiotensin II, and Renin Kinetics in Sepsis (DARK-Sepsis) randomized controlled trial: serum biomarkers to predict response to angiotensin II versus standard-of-care vasopressor therapy in the treatment of septic shock.DPP3、血管紧张素 II 和脓毒症中的肾素动力学(DARK-Sepsis)随机对照试验的科学原理和研究方案:血清生物标志物预测血管紧张素 II 与标准升压治疗对脓毒性休克治疗反应的比较。
Trials. 2024 Mar 12;25(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-07995-0.
9
Remote ischemic conditioning in septic shock (RECO-Sepsis): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.远程缺血后适应治疗脓毒性休克(RECO-Sepsis):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 May 22;20(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3406-4.
10
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.

引用本文的文献

1
The application of therapeutic plasma exchange in sepsis and septic shock: A narrative review.治疗性血浆置换在脓毒症和脓毒性休克中的应用:一项叙述性综述。
Sci Prog. 2025 Jul-Sep;108(3):368504251352747. doi: 10.1177/00368504251352747. Epub 2025 Jul 22.
2
A few words of caution on blood purification in sepsis.关于脓毒症血液净化的几点注意事项。
Crit Care. 2025 Jan 25;29(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05268-z.
3
Effect of therapeutic plasma exchange on tissue factor and tissue factor pathway inhibitor in septic shock.治疗性血浆置换对感染性休克组织因子和组织因子途径抑制剂的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical and biochemical endpoints and predictors of response to plasma exchange in septic shock: results from a randomized controlled trial.在感染性休克中,血浆置换治疗反应的临床和生化终点及预测因素:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Crit Care. 2022 May 12;26(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04003-2.
2
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
3
Adjuvant therapeutic plasma exchange in septic shock.
Crit Care. 2024 Oct 30;28(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05142-4.
4
[Extracorporeal procedures in sepsis].[脓毒症的体外治疗方法]
Anaesthesiologie. 2024 Oct;73(10):713-720. doi: 10.1007/s00101-024-01464-8.
5
[What is confirmed in the treatment of sepsis? : An update].[脓毒症治疗中的定论是什么?:最新进展]
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2024 Dec;65(12):1199-1208. doi: 10.1007/s00108-024-01794-0. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
6
Enhancing Survival in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Plasma Exchange Therapy.提高脓毒性休克的生存率:血浆置换疗法疗效的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2024 May 23;16(5):e60947. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60947. eCollection 2024 May.
脓毒性休克的辅助性治疗性血浆置换
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Mar;47(3):352-354. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06339-1. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
4
The therapeutic efficacy of adjunct therapeutic plasma exchange for septic shock with multiple organ failure: a single-center experience.辅助治疗性血浆置换治疗脓毒性休克伴多器官衰竭的疗效:单中心经验。
Crit Care. 2020 Aug 24;24(1):518. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03241-6.
5
To remove and replace-a role for plasma exchange in counterbalancing the host response in sepsis.去除并替换——血浆置换在平衡脓毒症宿主反应中的作用
Crit Care. 2019 Jan 17;23(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2289-1.
6
Early therapeutic plasma exchange in septic shock: a prospective open-label nonrandomized pilot study focusing on safety, hemodynamics, vascular barrier function, and biologic markers.早期治疗性血浆置换在感染性休克中的应用:一项关注安全性、血液动力学、血管屏障功能和生物标志物的前瞻性开放标签非随机初步研究。
Crit Care. 2018 Oct 30;22(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2220-9.
7
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle: 2018 update.拯救脓毒症运动集束化治疗方案:2018年更新版
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jun;44(6):925-928. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5085-0. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
8
Therapeutic plasma exchange in a tertiary care center: 185 patients undergoing 912 treatments - a one-year retrospective analysis.三级医疗中心的治疗性血浆置换:185例患者接受912次治疗——一项为期一年的回顾性分析。
BMC Nephrol. 2018 Jan 15;19(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0803-3.
9
Trimmed means for symptom trials with dropouts.针对有失访情况的症状试验的截尾均值。
Pharm Stat. 2017 Jan;16(1):20-28. doi: 10.1002/pst.1768. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
10
Hospital Incidence and Mortality Rates of Sepsis.脓毒症的医院发病率和死亡率
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Mar 11;113(10):159-66. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0159.