Sharma Dew Kumari, Fernández Juan Olivares, Rosenqvist Eva, Ottosen Carl-Otto, Andersen Sven Bode
Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Section of Plant and Soil Science, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark; Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Section for Crop Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Hojbakkegaard Allé 9, 2630 Taastrup, Denmark.
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos, Avenida Complutense s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
J Plant Physiol. 2014 May 1;171(8):576-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.09.025. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
The genotypic response of wheat cultivars as affected by two methods of heat stress treatment (treatment of intact plants in growth chambers versus treatment of detached leaves in test tubes) in a temperature controlled water bath were compared to investigate how such different methods of heat treatment affect chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. A set of 41 spring wheat cultivars differing in their maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem (PS) II (Fv/Fm) under heat stress conditions was used. These cultivars were previously evaluated based on the heat treatment of intact plants. The responses of the same cultivars to heat stress were compared between the two methods of heat treatment. The results showed that in detached leaves, all of the fluorescence parameters remained almost unaffected in control (20°C at all durations tested), indicating that the detachment itself did not affect the fluorescence parameters. In contrast, heat induced reduction in the maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII of detached leaves occurred within 2h at 40°C and within 30min at 45°C, and the response was more pronounced than when intact plants were heat stressed for three days at 40°C. The proportion of total variation that can be ascribed to the genetic differences among cultivars for a trait was estimated as genetic determination. During heat treatment, the genetic determination of most of the fluorescence parameters was lower in detached leaves than in intact plants. In addition, the correlation of the cultivar response in intact plants versus detached leaves was low (r=0.13 (with expt.1) and 0.02 with expt.2). The most important difference between the two methods was the pronounced difference in time scale of reaction, which may indicate the involvement of different physiological mechanisms in response to high temperatures. Further, the results suggest that genetic factors associated with cultivar differences are different for the two methods of heat treatment.
比较了两种热胁迫处理方法(在生长室中对完整植株进行处理与在试管中对离体叶片进行处理)对小麦品种基因型反应的影响,这两种处理是在温度可控的水浴中进行的,目的是研究不同的热处理方法如何影响叶绿素荧光参数。使用了一组41个春小麦品种,这些品种在热胁迫条件下的光系统(PS)II最大光化学效率(Fv/Fm)存在差异。这些品种之前已基于对完整植株的热处理进行过评估。比较了同一品种在两种热处理方法下对热胁迫的反应。结果表明,在离体叶片中,所有荧光参数在对照(所有测试时间段均为20°C)下几乎不受影响,这表明叶片离体本身不会影响荧光参数。相比之下,离体叶片在40°C下处理2小时内以及在45°C下处理30分钟内,PSII的最大光化学效率就会因热胁迫而降低,并且这种反应比完整植株在40°C下热胁迫三天时更为明显。将一个性状中可归因于品种间遗传差异的总变异比例估计为遗传决定度。在热处理过程中,大多数荧光参数的遗传决定度在离体叶片中低于完整植株。此外,完整植株与离体叶片中品种反应的相关性较低(实验1中r = 0.13,实验2中r = 0.02)。两种方法之间最重要的差异在于反应时间尺度上的显著差异,这可能表明响应高温涉及不同的生理机制。此外,结果表明,两种热处理方法中与品种差异相关的遗传因素不同。