Troll Christopher J, Adhikary Suraj, Cueff Marie, Mitra Ileena, Eichman Brandt F, Camps Manel
Department of Microbiology and Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Mutat Res. 2014 May-Jun;763-764:64-73. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
DNA glycosylases carry out the first step of base excision repair by removing damaged bases from DNA. The N3-methyladenine (3MeA) DNA glycosylases specialize in alkylation repair and are either constitutively expressed or induced by exposure to alkylating agents. To study the functional and evolutionary significance of constitutive versus inducible expression, we expressed two closely related yeast 3MeA DNA glycosylases - inducible Saccharomyces cerevisiae MAG and constitutive S. pombe Mag1 - in a glycosylase-deficient Escherichia coli strain. In both cases, constitutive expression conferred resistance to alkylating agent exposure. However, in the absence of exogenous alkylation, high levels of expression of both glycosylases were deleterious. We attribute this toxicity to excessive glycosylase activity, since suppressing spMag1 expression correlated with improved growth in liquid culture, and spMag1 mutants exhibiting decreased glycosylase activity showed improved growth and viability. Selection of a random spMag1 mutant library for increased survival in the presence of exogenous alkylation resulted in the selection of hypomorphic mutants, providing evidence for the presence of a genetic barrier to the evolution of enhanced glycosylase activity when constitutively expressed. We also show that low levels of 3MeA glycosylase expression improve fitness in our glycosylase-deficient host, implying that 3MeA glycosylase activity is likely necessary for repair of endogenous lesions. These findings suggest that 3MeA glycosylase activity is evolutionarily conserved for repair of endogenously produced alkyl lesions, and that inducible expression represents a common strategy to rectify deleterious effects of excessive 3MeA activity in the absence of exogenous alkylation challenge.
DNA糖基化酶通过从DNA中去除受损碱基来执行碱基切除修复的第一步。N3-甲基腺嘌呤(3MeA)DNA糖基化酶专门负责烷基化修复,要么组成性表达,要么由暴露于烷基化剂诱导表达。为了研究组成性表达与诱导性表达的功能和进化意义,我们在一种缺乏糖基化酶的大肠杆菌菌株中表达了两种密切相关的酵母3MeA DNA糖基化酶——诱导型酿酒酵母MAG和组成型粟酒裂殖酵母Mag1。在这两种情况下,组成性表达都赋予了对烷基化剂暴露的抗性。然而,在没有外源性烷基化的情况下,两种糖基化酶的高表达都是有害的。我们将这种毒性归因于糖基化酶活性过高,因为抑制spMag1表达与液体培养中生长的改善相关,并且表现出糖基化酶活性降低的spMag1突变体显示出生长和活力的改善。在存在外源性烷基化的情况下,选择一个随机的spMag1突变体文库以提高存活率,结果选择了亚效突变体,这为组成性表达时糖基化酶活性增强的进化存在遗传障碍提供了证据。我们还表明,低水平的3MeA糖基化酶表达提高了我们缺乏糖基化酶的宿主的适应性,这意味着3MeA糖基化酶活性可能是修复内源性损伤所必需的。这些发现表明,3MeA糖基化酶活性在进化上保守,用于修复内源性产生的烷基损伤,并且诱导性表达代表了一种常见策略,以纠正在外源性烷基化挑战不存在时过量3MeA活性的有害影响。