Bryant Curtis, Mendenhall Nancy P, Henderson Randal H, Nichols Romaine C, Mendenhall William M, Morris Christopher G, Williams Christopher, Su Zhong, Li Zuofeng, Hoppe Bradford S
University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun;39(3):261-5. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000050.
This matched-paired analysis explores disparities in health-related quality of life (QOL) and common toxicities between African American (AA) and white patients following proton therapy for prostate cancer at our institution.
A total of 1536 men with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated from 2006 to 2009 with definitive proton therapy to a median dose of 78 Gy +/- androgen deprivation therapy. A cohort of 92 consecutively treated AA men was matched to a cohort of 92 white men on the basis of National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk category and age. The 2 groups were compared with regard to comorbidities, demographics, and treatment regimen. Differences in genitourinary and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scale and QOL data from the Expanded Prostate Index Composite 26-question questionnaire were reported.
Median follow-up was 2.1 years. Baseline patient and treatment characteristics were similar between the 2 groups with the exception of prostate-specific antigen ≥10 (32% for AAs vs. 20% for whites; P=0.068) and use of androgen deprivation therapy (26% for AAs vs. 21% for whites; P=0.38). No difference in Expanded Prostate Index Composite 26-question sexual summary, urinary incontinence, urinary obstruction, or bowel summary scores was detected between the 2 groups, nor was there a difference in grade 2 or higher GI toxicity (P=0.45). AAs had a statistically nonsignificant higher absolute incidence of late grade 3 genitourinary toxicity (4.4% vs. 0%; P=0.12).
After 2 years, there were no disparities in health-related QOL, physician-reported Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events GI toxicity, or biochemical relapse. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm these findings.
本配对分析探讨了在我院接受前列腺癌质子治疗的非裔美国(AA)患者和白人患者之间,与健康相关的生活质量(QOL)差异及常见毒性反应。
2006年至2009年,共有1536例临床局限性前列腺癌男性患者接受了根治性质子治疗,中位剂量为78 Gy ± 雄激素剥夺治疗。根据美国国立综合癌症网络风险分类和年龄,将92例连续接受治疗的AA男性患者队列与92例白人男性患者队列进行匹配。比较两组患者的合并症、人口统计学特征和治疗方案。报告根据不良事件通用术语标准量表得出的泌尿生殖系统和胃肠道(GI)毒性差异,以及来自扩展前列腺指数综合26题问卷的QOL数据。
中位随访时间为2.1年。两组患者的基线特征和治疗特点相似,但前列腺特异性抗原≥10的患者比例(AA组为32%,白人组为20%;P = 0.068)以及雄激素剥夺治疗的使用情况(AA组为26%,白人组为21%;P = 0.38)除外。两组在扩展前列腺指数综合26题的性功能总结、尿失禁、尿路梗阻或肠道总结评分方面均未检测到差异,2级或更高等级的GI毒性也无差异(P = 0.45)。AA组晚期3级泌尿生殖系统毒性的绝对发生率较高,但无统计学意义(4.4% vs. 0%;P = 0.12)。
两年后,在与健康相关的QOL、医生报告的不良事件通用术语标准GI毒性或生化复发方面均无差异。需要更长时间的随访来证实这些发现。