• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

坐骨神经痛护理中实施共同决策的最重要因素:专业人员和患者的排名

Most important factors for the implementation of shared decision making in sciatica care: ranking among professionals and patients.

作者信息

Hofstede Stefanie N, van Bodegom-Vos Leti, Wentink Manon M, Vleggeert-Lankamp Carmen L A, Vliet Vlieland Thea P M, Marang-van de Mheen Perla J

机构信息

Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Apr 7;9(4):e94176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094176. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0094176
PMID:24710328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3978036/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Due to the increasing specialization of medical professionals, patients are treated by multiple disciplines. To ensure that delivered care is patient-centered, it is crucial that professionals and the patient together decide on treatment (shared decision making (SDM)). However, it is not known how SDM should be integrated in multidisciplinary practice. This study determines the most important factors for SDM implementation in sciatica care, as it is known that a prior inventory of factors is crucial to develop a successful implementation strategy.

METHODS

246 professionals (general practitioners, physical therapists, neurologists, neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons) (30% response) and 155 patients (96% response) responded to an internet-based survey. Respondents ranked barriers and facilitators identified in previous interviews, on their importance using Maximum Difference Scaling. Feeding back the personal top 5 most important factors, each respondent indicated whether these factors were barriers or facilitators. Hierarchical Bayes estimation was used to estimate the relative importance (RI) of each factor.

RESULTS

Professionals assigned the highest importance to: quality of professional-patient relationship (RI 4.87; CI 4.75-4.99); importance of quick recovery of patient (RI 4.83; CI 4.69-4.97); and knowledge about treatment options (RI 6.64; CI 4.53-4.74), which were reported as barrier and facilitator. Professionals working in primary care had a different ranking than those working in hospital care. Patients assigned the highest importance to: correct diagnosis by professionals (barrier, RI 8.19; CI 7.99-8.38); information provision about treatment options and potential harm and benefits (RI 7.87; CI 7.65-8.08); and explanation of the professional about the care trajectory (RI 7.16; CI 6.94-7.38), which were reported as barrier and facilitator.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge, information provision and a good relationship are the most important conditions for SDM perceived by both patients and professionals. These conditions are not restricted to one specific disease or health care system, because they are mostly professional or patient dependent and require healthcare professional training.

摘要

引言

由于医学专业人员的专业化程度不断提高,患者由多个学科进行治疗。为确保所提供的护理以患者为中心,专业人员与患者共同决定治疗方案(共同决策,SDM)至关重要。然而,尚不清楚如何将共同决策融入多学科实践中。本研究确定了坐骨神经痛护理中实施共同决策的最重要因素,因为众所周知,事先梳理这些因素对于制定成功的实施策略至关重要。

方法

246名专业人员(全科医生、物理治疗师、神经科医生、神经外科医生、骨科医生)(回复率30%)和155名患者(回复率96%)对一项基于互联网的调查做出了回应。受访者使用最大差异量表对先前访谈中确定的障碍和促进因素的重要性进行了排序。在反馈个人最重要的5个因素时,每位受访者指出这些因素是障碍还是促进因素。采用分层贝叶斯估计来估计每个因素的相对重要性(RI)。

结果

专业人员认为最重要的因素是:医患关系质量(RI 4.87;CI 4.75 - 4.99);患者快速康复的重要性(RI 4.83;CI 4.69 - 4.97);以及对治疗选择的了解(RI 6.64;CI 4.53 - 4.74),这些因素既有障碍因素也有促进因素。初级保健领域的专业人员与医院护理领域的专业人员排名不同。患者认为最重要的因素是:专业人员的正确诊断(障碍,RI 8.19;CI 7.99 - 8.38);关于治疗选择以及潜在危害和益处的信息提供(RI 7.87;CI 7.65 - 8.08);以及专业人员对护理过程的解释(RI 7.16;CI 6.94 - 7.38),这些因素既有障碍因素也有促进因素。

结论

知识、信息提供和良好的关系是患者和专业人员都认为的共同决策最重要的条件。这些条件并不局限于一种特定疾病或医疗保健系统,因为它们大多取决于专业人员或患者,并且需要对医疗保健专业人员进行培训。

相似文献

1
Most important factors for the implementation of shared decision making in sciatica care: ranking among professionals and patients.坐骨神经痛护理中实施共同决策的最重要因素:专业人员和患者的排名
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 7;9(4):e94176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094176. eCollection 2014.
2
Barriers and facilitators to implement shared decision making in multidisciplinary sciatica care: a qualitative study.多学科坐骨神经痛治疗中实施共享决策的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2013 Aug 23;8:95. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-95.
3
Designing an implementation strategy to improve interprofessional shared decision making in sciatica: study protocol of the DISC study.设计一项实施策略以改善 sciatica 中的跨专业共享决策:DISC 研究的研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2012 Jun 15;7:55. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-55.
4
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.
5
Patients' and healthcare professionals' perceived facilitators and barriers for shared decision-making for frail and elderly patients in perioperative care: a scoping review.患者和医疗保健专业人员对衰弱和老年患者围手术期护理中共同决策的感知促进因素和障碍:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 24;23(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09120-4.
6
Continuing professional education of Iranian healthcare professionals in shared decision-making: lessons learned.伊朗医疗保健专业人员在共同决策方面的继续职业教育:经验教训
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 12;21(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06233-6.
7
Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员共同决策使用率的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7(7):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub4.
8
Healthcare professionals' views on shared decision-making in plastic surgery in the Netherlands.荷兰医疗保健专业人员对整形手术中共同决策的看法。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 Oct;85:463-472. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.07.041. Epub 2023 Jul 23.
9
Healthcare professionals' views on factors influencing shared decision-making in primary health care centres in Saudi Arabia: A qualitative study.沙特阿拉伯基层医疗中心影响医患共同决策因素的卫生保健专业人员观点:一项定性研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Apr;28(2):235-246. doi: 10.1111/jep.13616. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
10
Barriers and facilitators for shared decision-making in oncology inpatient practice: an explorative study of the healthcare providers' perspective.肿瘤住院实践中共同决策的障碍和促进因素:医疗保健提供者视角的探索性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 May;30(5):3925-3931. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06820-1. Epub 2022 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Role matters in understanding 'quality' in palliative care: a qualitative analysis of patient, caregiver and practitioner perspectives.在理解姑息治疗中的“质量”时,角色很重要:对患者、护理人员和从业者观点的定性分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 17;14(1):e076768. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076768.
2
The Practice of Shared Decision-Making Among Physiotherapists and Patients with Musculoskeletal Conditions.物理治疗师与肌肉骨骼疾病患者之间的共同决策实践。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Sep 8;16:2655-2665. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S425315. eCollection 2023.
3
Shared decision-making for renal replacement treatment and illness perception in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary care approaches to musculoskeletal multiple-site joint pain pharmacological therapy: a survey of general practitioners.肌肉骨骼多部位关节疼痛药物治疗的基层医疗方法:全科医生调查
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2014 Oct;15(4):476-81. doi: 10.1017/S1463423613000546. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
2
Barriers and facilitators to implement shared decision making in multidisciplinary sciatica care: a qualitative study.多学科坐骨神经痛治疗中实施共享决策的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2013 Aug 23;8:95. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-95.
3
Enhanced support for shared decision making reduced costs of care for patients with preference-sensitive conditions.
终末期慢性肾脏病患者的肾脏替代治疗和疾病感知的共同决策。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Aug 14;23(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02261-w.
4
The influence of the environment on the patient-centered therapeutic relationship in physical therapy: a qualitative study.环境对物理治疗中以患者为中心的治疗关系的影响:一项定性研究。
Arch Public Health. 2023 May 17;81(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01064-9.
5
Increasing Quality and Frequency of Goals-of-Care Documentation in the Highest-Risk Surgical Candidates: One-Year Results of the Surgical Pause Program.提高高风险手术患者护理目标记录的质量和频率:手术暂停计划的一年结果
JB JS Open Access. 2023 Apr 24;8(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00107. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
6
Integrating Patient and Expert Perspectives to Conceptualize High-Quality Palliative Cancer Care for Symptoms in the US Veterans Health Administration: A Qualitative Study.将患者和专家观点相结合,构思美国退伍军人健康管理局癌症患者症状的高质量姑息治疗:一项定性研究。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231160374. doi: 10.1177/00469580231160374.
7
Clinical Symptoms Contributing to Zenker's Diverticulum Repair: A Retrospective Review.有助于行Zenker憩室修复术的临床症状:一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2022 Feb 18;14(2):e22369. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22369. eCollection 2022 Feb.
8
Readability of patient education materials related to radiation safety: What are the implications for patient-centred radiology care?与辐射安全相关的患者教育材料的可读性:对以患者为中心的放射学护理有何影响?
Insights Imaging. 2021 Oct 21;12(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01094-3.
9
Patient and Caregiver Prioritization of Palliative and End-of-Life Cancer Care Quality Measures.患者和照护者对姑息治疗和临终癌症护理质量措施的优先排序。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(6):1429-1435. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07041-8. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
10
Stratified versus usual care for the management of primary care patients with sciatica: the SCOPiC RCT.分层与常规护理对坐骨神经痛初级保健患者管理的比较:SCOPiC RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Oct;24(49):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta24490.
增强对共享决策的支持可降低偏好敏感型疾病患者的医疗成本。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):285-93. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0941.
4
Why are response rates in clinician surveys declining?为什么临床医生调查的回复率在下降?
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Apr;58(4):e225-8.
5
Surgery versus conservative management of sciatica due to a lumbar herniated disc: a systematic review.腰椎间盘突出症所致坐骨神经痛的手术与保守治疗:系统评价。
Eur Spine J. 2011 Apr;20(4):513-22. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1603-7. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
6
Implementing shared decision making in the NHS.在英国国家医疗服务体系中实施共同决策。
BMJ. 2010 Oct 14;341:c5146. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5146.
7
Validating a conceptual model for an inter-professional approach to shared decision making: a mixed methods study.验证跨专业团队共同决策方法的概念模型:一项混合方法研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Aug;17(4):554-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01515.x. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
8
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.
9
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2.
10
Patient preferences and expectations for care: determinants in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.患者对护理的偏好和期望:腰椎间盘突出症患者的决定因素
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Nov 15;33(24):2663-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818cb0db.