The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Mar 6;15(2):4042. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4042.
The purpose of this study was to compare the resulting full width at half maximum of slice sensitivity profiles (SSP) generated by several commercially available point response phantoms, and determine an appropriate imaging technique and analysis method. Four CT phantoms containing point response objects designed to produce a delta impulse signal used in this study: a Fluke CT-SSP phantom, a Gammex 464, a CatPhan 600, and a Kagaku Micro Disc phantom. Each phantom was imaged using 120 kVp, 325 mAs, head scan field of view, 32 × 0.625 mm helical scan with a 20 mm beam width and a pitch of 0.969. The acquired images were then reconstructed into all available slice thicknesses (0.625 mm - 5.0 mm). A computer program was developed to analyze the images of each dataset for generating a SSP from which the full width at half maximum (FWHM) was determined. Two methods for generating SSPs were evaluated and compared by choosing the mean vs. maximum value in the ROI, along with two methods for evaluating the FWHM of the SSP, linear interpolation and Gaussian curve fitting. FWHMs were compared with the manufacturer's specifications using percent error and z-test with a significance value of p < 0.05. The FWHMs from each phantom were not significantly different (p ≥ 0.089) with an average error of 3.5%. The FWHMs from SSPs generated from the mean value were statistically different (p ≤ 3.99 × 10¹³). The FWHMs from the different FWHM methods were not statistically different (p ≤ 0.499). Evaluation of the SSP is dependent on the ROI value used. The maximum value from the ROI should be used to generate the SSP whenever possible. SSP measurement is independent of the phantoms used in this study.
本研究的目的是比较几种市售点响应体模产生的切片灵敏度分布(SSP)的半峰全宽(FWHM),并确定合适的成像技术和分析方法。本研究使用了四种包含点响应物体的 CT 体模:Fluke CT-SSP 体模、Gammex 464 体模、CatPhan 600 体模和 Kagaku Micro Disc 体模。每个体模均使用 120 kVp、325 mAs、头部扫描视野、32 × 0.625mm 螺旋扫描、20mm 光束宽度和 0.969 的螺距进行成像。采集的图像随后被重建为所有可用的切片厚度(0.625mm-5.0mm)。开发了一个计算机程序来分析每个数据集的图像,以生成 SSP,从中确定 FWHM。通过在 ROI 中选择平均值与最大值,评估并比较了两种生成 SSP 的方法,以及两种评估 SSP 的 FWHM 的方法,即线性插值和高斯曲线拟合。使用百分比误差和 z 检验(显著性水平 p < 0.05)比较 FWHM 与制造商的规格。每个体模的 FWHM 没有显著差异(p ≥ 0.089),平均误差为 3.5%。从平均值生成的 SSP 的 FWHM 在统计学上存在显著差异(p ≤ 3.99×10¹³)。不同 FWHM 方法的 FWHM 没有统计学差异(p ≤ 0.499)。SSP 的评估取决于使用的 ROI 值。只要有可能,就应该使用 ROI 的最大值来生成 SSP。SSP 测量与本研究中使用的体模无关。