Marin Clara, Palomeque Maria-Dolores, Marco-Jiménez Francisco, Vega Santiago
Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Departamento de Producción Animal, Sanidad Animal, Salud Pública Veterinaria y Ciencia y Tecnología de los Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad CEU-Cardenal Herrera, Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, Spain.
Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología Animal, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 7;9(4):e94191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094191. eCollection 2014.
The existence of Campylobacter and Salmonella reservoirs in wildlife is a potential hazard to animal and human health; however, the prevalence of these species is largely unknown. Until now, only a few studies have evaluated the presence of Campylobacter and Salmonella in wild griffon vultures and based on a small number of birds. The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of Campylobacter and Salmonella in wild griffon vultures (n = 97) during the normal ringing programme at the Cinctorres Observatory in Eastern Spain. In addition, the effect of ages of individuals (juveniles, subadult and adult) on the presence were compared. Campylobacter was isolated from 1 of 97 (1.0%) griffon vultures and identified as C. jejuni. Salmonella was isolated from 51 of 97 (52.6%) griffon vultures. No significant differences were found between the ages of individuals for the presence of Salmonella. Serotyping revealed 6 different serovars among two Salmonella enterica subspecies; S. enterica subsp. enterica (n = 49, 96.1%) and S. enterica subsp. salamae (n = 2, 3.9%). No more than one serovar was isolated per individual. The serovars isolated were S. Typhimurium (n = 42, 82.3%), S. Rissen (n = 4, 7.8%), S. Senftenberg (n = 3, 5.9%) and S. 4,12:b[-] (n = 2, 3.9%). Our results imply that wild griffon vultures are a risk factor for Salmonella transmission, but do not seem to be a reservoir for Campylobacter. We therefore rule out vultures as a risk factor for human campylobacteriosis. Nevertheless, further studies should be undertaken in other countries to confirm these results.
野生动物中弯曲杆菌和沙门氏菌宿主的存在对动物和人类健康构成潜在危害;然而,这些物种的流行程度在很大程度上尚不清楚。到目前为止,只有少数研究评估了野生兀鹫中弯曲杆菌和沙门氏菌的存在情况,且所依据的鸟类数量较少。本研究的目的是在西班牙东部辛托雷斯天文台的正常环志计划期间,评估野生兀鹫(n = 97)中弯曲杆菌和沙门氏菌的存在情况。此外,还比较了个体年龄(幼鸟、亚成鸟和成年鸟)对其存在情况的影响。从97只兀鹫中的1只(1.0%)分离出弯曲杆菌,并鉴定为空肠弯曲杆菌。从97只兀鹫中的51只(52.6%)分离出沙门氏菌。在沙门氏菌的存在情况方面,未发现个体年龄之间存在显著差异。血清分型显示在两个肠炎沙门氏菌亚种中有6种不同的血清型;肠炎沙门氏菌亚种肠炎沙门氏菌(n = 49,96.1%)和肠炎沙门氏菌亚种萨拉姆沙门氏菌(n = 2,3.9%)。每个个体分离出的血清型不超过一种。分离出的血清型为鼠伤寒沙门氏菌(n = 42,82.3%)、里森沙门氏菌(n = 4,7.8%)、森夫滕贝格沙门氏菌(n = 3,5.9%)和4,12:b[-]沙门氏菌(n = 2,3.9%)。我们的结果表明,野生兀鹫是沙门氏菌传播的一个风险因素,但似乎不是弯曲杆菌的宿主。因此,我们排除兀鹫作为人类弯曲杆菌病的一个风险因素。尽管如此,其他国家应开展进一步研究以证实这些结果。