Merckel Laura G, Verkooijen Helena M, Peters Nicky H G M, Mann Ritse M, Veldhuis Wouter B, Storm Remmert K, Weits Teun, Duvivier Katya M, van Dalen Thijs, Mali Willem P Th M, Peeters Petra H M, van den Bosch Maurice A A J
Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Imaging division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 8;9(4):e94233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094233. eCollection 2014.
To investigate the added diagnostic value of 3.0 Tesla breast MRI over conventional breast imaging in the diagnosis of in situ and invasive breast cancer and to explore the role of routine versus expert reading.
We evaluated MRI scans of patients with nonpalpable BI-RADS 3-5 lesions who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced 3.0 Tesla breast MRI. Initially, MRI scans were read by radiologists in a routine clinical setting. All histologically confirmed index lesions were re-evaluated by two dedicated breast radiologists. Sensitivity and specificity for the three MRI readings were determined, and the diagnostic value of breast MRI in addition to conventional imaging was assessed. Interobserver reliability between the three readings was evaluated.
MRI examinations of 207 patients were analyzed. Seventy-eight of 207 (37.7%) patients had a malignant lesion, of which 33 (42.3%) patients had pure DCIS and 45 (57.7%) invasive breast cancer. Sensitivity of breast MRI was 66.7% during routine, and 89.3% and 94.7% during expert reading. Specificity was 77.5% in the routine setting, and 61.0% and 33.3% during expert reading. In the routine setting, MRI provided additional diagnostic information over clinical information and conventional imaging, as the Area Under the ROC Curve increased from 0.76 to 0.81. Expert MRI reading was associated with a stronger improvement of the AUC to 0.87. Interobserver reliability between the three MRI readings was fair and moderate.
3.0 T breast MRI of nonpalpable breast lesions is of added diagnostic value for the diagnosis of in situ and invasive breast cancer.
探讨3.0特斯拉乳腺磁共振成像(MRI)在原位癌和浸润性乳腺癌诊断中相对于传统乳腺成像的附加诊断价值,并探讨常规解读与专家解读的作用。
我们评估了接受动态对比增强3.0特斯拉乳腺MRI检查的、乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)3 - 5类不可触及病变患者的MRI扫描图像。最初,MRI扫描图像由放射科医生在常规临床环境下进行解读。所有经组织学证实的索引病变均由两名专业乳腺放射科医生重新评估。确定了三种MRI解读的敏感性和特异性,并评估了乳腺MRI相对于传统成像的诊断价值。评估了三种解读之间的观察者间可靠性。
分析了207例患者的MRI检查结果。207例患者中有78例(37.7%)患有恶性病变,其中33例(42.3%)为单纯导管原位癌(DCIS),45例(57.7%)为浸润性乳腺癌。乳腺MRI在常规解读时的敏感性为66.7%,在专家解读时分别为89.3%和94.7%。特异性在常规解读时为77.5%,在专家解读时分别为61.0%和33.3%。在常规情况下,MRI相对于临床信息和传统成像提供了额外的诊断信息,因为ROC曲线下面积从0.76增加到了0.81。专家对MRI的解读使AUC更显著地提高到0.87。三种MRI解读之间的观察者间可靠性为中等。
对于不可触及乳腺病变的3.0 T乳腺MRI在原位癌和浸润性乳腺癌的诊断中具有附加诊断价值。