Hirose Masato, Fukiage Ryuma, Katoh Toru, Kajihara Hiroshi
Coastal Ecosystem Restoration, International Coastal Research Center, Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa 277-8564, Chiba, Japan.
Laboratory of Dead Body Science, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku 113-0033, Tokyo, Japan.
Zookeys. 2014 Apr 4(398):1-31. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.398.5176. eCollection 2014.
We describe Phoronis emigi sp. n. as the eighth member of the genus based on specimens collected from a sandy bottom at 33.2 m depth in Tomioka Bay, Amakusa, Japan. The new species is morphologically similar to P. psammophila Cori, 1889, but can be distinguished from the latter by the number of longitudinal muscle bundles in the body wall (56-72 vs. 25-50 in P. psammophila) and the position of the nephridiopores (situated level with the anus vs. lower than the anus in P. psammophila). Using sequences of the nuclear 18S and 28S rRNA genes and the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene, we inferred the relationship of P. emigi to other phoronids by the maximum likelihood method and Bayesian analysis. The analyses showed that P. emigi is closely related to P. hippocrepia Wright, 1856 and P. psammophila Cori, 1889. We describe the morphology of the topotypes and additional material for P. ijimai Oka, 1897. Neither our morphological observations of P. ijimai, nor the phylogenetic analyses based on 18S and COI sequences, contradicts that P. vancouverensis Pixell, 1912 is conspecific with P. ijimai, a synonymy that has long been disputed.
我们基于从日本天草富冈湾33.2米深处的沙质海底采集的标本,将埃米吉帚虫(Phoronis emigi sp. n.)描述为该属的第八个成员。新物种在形态上与1889年的科里氏沙质帚虫(P. psammophila Cori)相似,但可通过体壁纵肌束的数量(56 - 72束,而科里氏沙质帚虫为25 - 50束)和肾孔的位置(与肛门处于同一水平,而科里氏沙质帚虫的肾孔低于肛门)与后者区分开来。利用核18S和28S rRNA基因以及线粒体细胞色素c氧化酶亚基I(COI)基因的序列,我们通过最大似然法和贝叶斯分析推断了埃米吉帚虫与其他帚虫类的关系。分析表明,埃米吉帚虫与1856年的海马状帚虫(P. hippocrepia Wright)和1889年的科里氏沙质帚虫密切相关。我们描述了1897年冈田氏帚虫(P. ijimai Oka)正模标本及其他标本的形态。我们对冈田氏帚虫的形态观察以及基于18S和COI序列的系统发育分析,均未与1912年的温哥华帚虫(P. vancouverensis Pixell)与冈田氏帚虫同种这一观点相矛盾,而这一同物异名长期以来一直存在争议。