Suppr超能文献

书面干扰词会影响显性图片命名过程中的大脑活动。

Written distractor words influence brain activity during overt picture naming.

机构信息

Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, School of Medicine, Duke University Durham, NC, USA ; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University Durham, NC, USA.

Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, School of Medicine, Duke University Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Mar 24;8:167. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00167. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Language production requires multiple stages of processing (e.g., semantic retrieval, lexical selection), each of which may involve distinct brain regions. Distractor words can be combined with picture naming to examine factors that influence language production. Phonologically-related distractors have been found to speed picture naming (facilitation), while slower response times and decreased accuracy (interference) generally occur when a distractor is categorically related to the target image. However, other types of semantically-related distractors have been reported to produce a facilitative effect (e.g., associative, part-whole). The different pattern of results for different types of semantically-related distractors raises the question about how the nature of the semantic relation influences the effect of the distractor. To explore the nature of these semantic effects further, we used functional MRI to examine the influence of four types of written distractors on brain activation during overt picture naming. Distractors began with the same sound, were categorically-related, part of the object to be named, or were unrelated to the picture. Phonologically-related trials elicited greater activation than both semantic conditions (categorically-related and part-whole) in left insula and bilateral parietal cortex, regions that have been attributed to phonological aspects of production and encoding, respectively. Semantic conditions elicited greater activation than phonological trials in left posterior MTG, a region that has been linked to concept retrieval and semantic integration. Overall, the two semantic conditions did not differ substantially in their functional activation which suggests a similarity in the semantic demands and lexical competition across these two conditions.

摘要

语言产生需要多个处理阶段(例如,语义检索、词汇选择),每个阶段都可能涉及不同的大脑区域。干扰词可以与图片命名相结合,以研究影响语言产生的因素。研究发现,与语音相关的干扰词会加快图片命名的速度(促进),而当干扰词与目标图像在类别上相关时,通常会导致反应时间变慢和准确性降低(干扰)。然而,其他类型的语义相关干扰词已被报道会产生促进作用(例如,联想、部分-整体)。不同类型的语义相关干扰词产生不同结果的模式提出了一个问题,即语义关系的性质如何影响干扰词的效果。为了进一步探讨这些语义效应的性质,我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究了四种类型的书面干扰词对显性图片命名过程中大脑激活的影响。干扰词的开头音相同,与目标图像类别相关,是要命名的物体的一部分,或者与图片无关。与语音相关的试验在左侧脑岛和双侧顶叶皮层中引起的激活大于两种语义条件(类别相关和部分-整体),这两个区域分别被归因于产生和编码的语音方面。在左后颞中回(MTG)中,语义条件引起的激活大于语音条件,这一区域与概念检索和语义整合有关。总的来说,这两种语义条件在功能激活方面没有显著差异,这表明这两种条件在语义需求和词汇竞争方面具有相似性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/780f/3970014/ca171a66a6bb/fnhum-08-00167-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验