• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

图片-词汇干扰在语言产生研究中的作用:探索注意力和加工时间的作用。

Picture-word interference in language production studies: Exploring the roles of attention and processing times.

机构信息

Department of Linguistics.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Jul;48(7):1019-1046. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001098. Epub 2022 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0001098
PMID:35389697
Abstract

The picture-word interference paradigm (participants name target pictures while ignoring distractor words) is often used to model the planning processes involved in word production. The participants' naming times are delayed in the presence of a distractor (general interference). The size of this effect depends on the relationship between the target and distractor words. Distractors of the same semantic category create more interference (semantic interference), and distractors overlapping in phonology create less interference (phonological facilitation). The present study examined the relationships between these experimental effects, processing times, and attention in order to better understand the cognitive processes underlying participants' behavior in this paradigm. Participants named pictures with a superimposed line of Xs, semantically related distractors, phonologically related distractors, or unrelated distractors. General interference, semantic interference, and phonological facilitation effects were replicated. Distributional analyses revealed that general and semantic interference effects increase with naming times, while phonological facilitation decreases. The phonological facilitation and semantic interference effects were found to depend on the synchronicity in processing times between the planning of the picture's name and the processing of the distractor word. Finally, electroencephalographic power in the alpha band before stimulus onset varied with the position of the trial in the experiment and with repetition but did not predict the size of interference/facilitation effects. Taken together, these results suggest that experimental effects in the picture-word interference paradigm depend on processing times to both the target word and distractor word and that distributional patterns could partly reflect this dependency. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

图片-词汇干扰范式(参与者在忽略干扰词的情况下命名目标图片)通常用于模拟词汇产生过程中的规划过程。在存在干扰词的情况下,参与者的命名时间会延迟(一般干扰)。这种效应的大小取决于目标词和干扰词之间的关系。同一语义类别的干扰词会产生更大的干扰(语义干扰),而在语音上重叠的干扰词会产生较小的干扰(语音促进)。本研究旨在探讨这些实验效应、加工时间和注意力之间的关系,以便更好地理解参与者在该范式中行为背后的认知过程。参与者在命名图片时,图片上叠加有 X 线、语义相关的干扰词、语音相关的干扰词或不相关的干扰词。重现了一般干扰、语义干扰和语音促进效应。分布分析表明,一般干扰和语义干扰效应随命名时间的增加而增加,而语音促进效应则随命名时间的增加而减少。语音促进效应和语义干扰效应取决于目标词和干扰词的加工时间之间的同步性。最后,刺激前的 alpha 波段脑电功率随实验中试验的位置和重复而变化,但不能预测干扰/促进效应的大小。总之,这些结果表明,图片-词汇干扰范式中的实验效应取决于对目标词和干扰词的加工时间,并且分布模式在一定程度上反映了这种依赖性。

相似文献

1
Picture-word interference in language production studies: Exploring the roles of attention and processing times.图片-词汇干扰在语言产生研究中的作用:探索注意力和加工时间的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Jul;48(7):1019-1046. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001098. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
2
On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm.关于图片-单词干扰范式中语义干扰效应的类别性质。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):125-31. doi: 10.3758/bf03196357.
3
A novel multi-word paradigm for investigating semantic context effects in language production.一种用于研究语言产生中语义语境效应的新的多词范式。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 10;15(4):e0230439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230439. eCollection 2020.
4
Enhancement and suppression in a lexical interference fMRI-paradigm.词汇干扰 fMRI 范式中的增强和抑制。
Brain Behav. 2012 Mar;2(2):109-27. doi: 10.1002/brb3.31.
5
Adaptation of a semantic picture-word interference paradigm for future language mapping with transcranial magnetic stimulation: A behavioural study.用于经颅磁刺激未来语言映射的语义图片词汇干扰范式的改编:一项行为研究。
Behav Brain Res. 2021 Aug 27;412:113418. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113418. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
6
Morphological facilitation and semantic interference in compound production: An ERP study.形态促进和语义干扰在复合词产生中的作用:一项 ERP 研究。
Cognition. 2021 Apr;209:104518. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104518. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
7
How a question context aids word production: Evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm.问题语境如何辅助词汇生成:来自图词干扰范式的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Feb;73(2):165-173. doi: 10.1177/1747021819882911. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
8
Effect of hearing loss on semantic access by auditory and audiovisual speech in children.听力损失对儿童通过听觉和视听语音进行语义理解的影响。
Ear Hear. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(6):753-62. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318294e3f5.
9
Electrophysiological characterization of facilitation and interference in the picture-word interference paradigm.图片词汇干扰范式中易化和干扰的电生理特征。
Psychophysiology. 2017 Sep;54(9):1370-1392. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12885. Epub 2017 May 4.
10
Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.与显性命名中语义和 Stroop 样干扰效应相关的事件相关电位和振荡脑反应。
Brain Res. 2012 Apr 23;1450:87-101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.050. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging relatedness-based measures in people with language disorders: A scoping review.在语言障碍患者中利用基于关联性的测量方法:一项范围综述。
J Neuropsychol. 2025 Jun;19(2):299-337. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12405. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
2
A cautionary note on the studies using the picture-word interference paradigm: the unwelcome consequences of the random use of "in/animates".关于使用图片-单词干扰范式研究的警示:随意使用“有生命/无生命”概念带来的不良后果
Front Psychol. 2023 May 5;14:1145884. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145884. eCollection 2023.
3
Distributional properties of semantic interference in picture naming: Bayesian meta-analyses.
命名图片时语义干扰的分布特征:贝叶斯元分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Apr;29(2):635-647. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02016-6. Epub 2021 Nov 4.